Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cosmocat

(15,424 posts)
15. If I have read or heard SLIGHT
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 02:21 PM
Nov 2012

100 times this election, EVERY stinking time it has been in relation to the President ...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He does not suffer fools gladly. GentryDixon Nov 2012 #1
+1. '..abandon the pretense that your goal is to inform rather than entertain the public.' freshwest Nov 2012 #33
The pundits have been going after him a lot more this time around, and I think he's fed up with it. FVZA_Colonel Nov 2012 #38
And mainstream punditry is chock full of fools. JHB Nov 2012 #48
Nor should he tavalon Nov 2012 #56
CBS last night wryter2000 Nov 2012 #2
Nate does not suffer fools like Schieffer at all. speedoo Nov 2012 #8
255? So they have Ohio with Obama exboyfil Nov 2012 #9
Apparently in pundit world, 15 = 64 fujiyama Nov 2012 #14
Flat out - D v R framing Cosmocat Nov 2012 #16
Yup, its the math stupid. riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #36
Math is not their strong point. We already know this! mnhtnbb Nov 2012 #52
Yeah, but pundits say stupid things for a living, and freepers generlly just do it as a hobby. n/t D23MIURG23 Nov 2012 #58
This is very healthy; the pundits are useless BeyondGeography Nov 2012 #3
Once again... txdemsftw Nov 2012 #4
Indeed. BouzoukiKing Nov 2012 #12
VERY good point. calimary Nov 2012 #23
Not just any math. ARITHMETIC! Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #34
Exactly. TahitiNut Nov 2012 #42
Then again, briv1016 Nov 2012 #43
He's under attack as much as Obama. Charlie Rose "prosecuted" him. SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2012 #5
at least two possibilties to Romney win Melissa G Nov 2012 #6
If Nate wanted to back up his numbers with what the chance Dustlawyer Nov 2012 #45
As I heard someone point out the pundits predictions are less reliable than a coin toss Anthony McCarthy Nov 2012 #7
Assuming Obama has Ohio exboyfil Nov 2012 #17
On This Weeks Geo Stephanopolis INdemo Nov 2012 #57
Nate Silver doesn't just aggregate polls, they get put through his own software which JaneyVee Nov 2012 #10
wooooooo! that's got to smart for the jackasses like Ed and Tweets and Rach. Whisp Nov 2012 #11
Nonsense davekriss Nov 2012 #20
^^^ This is correct ^^^ oswaldactedalone Nov 2012 #31
^^^That is incorrect^^^ Whisp Nov 2012 #51
and ... media please stop ... Democrats4All Nov 2012 #13
If I have read or heard SLIGHT Cosmocat Nov 2012 #15
Welcome to DU, Democrats4All! calimary Nov 2012 #24
I'll bet 10 thousand dollars that Obama wins (n/t) thesquanderer Nov 2012 #18
Nate Silver is partially wrong TomClash Nov 2012 #19
Exactly Tom fasttense Nov 2012 #44
LOL! Folks, it's all about the MONEY! Up2Late Nov 2012 #21
Getting a dose of fox news without my consent and it's an alternate universe there mountain grammy Nov 2012 #26
It's not just Fox pscot Nov 2012 #49
spoken like the endearing nerd that he is. Hamlette Nov 2012 #22
"Shotsfired", huh? Well, then Cha Nov 2012 #25
Nate makes a **HUGE** error here. garybeck Nov 2012 #27
Yes, good point dreamnightwind Nov 2012 #30
Fraud. nt riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #37
He basically says that the only way Mitt Romney wins RomneyLies Nov 2012 #28
Republicans and their pundits felix_numinous Nov 2012 #29
Wait til they find out Mr. Silver used to write on DailyKos. blkmusclmachine Nov 2012 #32
Dear MSM: Please "inform rather than entertain." Thank you. n/t Beartracks Nov 2012 #35
Nate Silver is the man. I'd love to meet him and shake his hand. dorksied Nov 2012 #39
He is like the Moneyball guy only with polling. Taking on conventional wisdom and improving Quixote1818 Nov 2012 #40
k&r n/t RainDog Nov 2012 #41
GOOD, Becasue the mainstream pundits are more or less irrelevant Iggy Nov 2012 #46
Interesting take, considering that he never once mentioned "mainstream political pundits"! George II Nov 2012 #47
The newz is just another TV show... heppcatt Nov 2012 #50
Nate Silver may have forgotten a few things lobodons Nov 2012 #53
oooga booga! the sky is falling!! MjolnirTime Nov 2012 #55
Does Nate factor in turnout? cilla4progress Nov 2012 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WOW: Nate Silver Took A H...»Reply #15