General Discussion

Bev54

(13,432 posts)

24. Philip Rucker, the editor on this piece in the WaPo, did say on MSNBC

Reply to onenote (Original post)

Fri Aug 12, 2022, 11:04 AM

Aug 2022

telephone interview that they did find and retrieve documents related to the Nuclear program.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The risk of assuming facts not in evidence [View all] onenote Aug 2022 OP

Caution is warranted. There are any number of Tetrachloride Aug 2022 #1

Absolutely, thank you luv2fly Aug 2022 #2

In addition . . . werdna Aug 2022 #3

I see nothing wrong with speculation. Demsrule86 Aug 2022 #4

Exactly. I do it. Magoo48 Aug 2022 #38

They have to have a 100% solid case! imanamerican63 Aug 2022 #5

Very true, but Trump at least did suggest that evidence was planted gulliver Aug 2022 #6

You might be on to something KS Toronado Aug 2022 #12

Our prisons are full of People who claim innocence and things were planted. pwb Aug 2022 #35

The "nuclear" doc report is based on a leak, and not yet confirmed by DOJ. Fiendish Thingy Aug 2022 #7

I don't have a good sense of what's happening right now Sympthsical Aug 2022 #8

Good advice, but ....... 70sEraVet Aug 2022 #9

Good advice Farmer-Rick Aug 2022 #10

Drumpf says all factual scenarios are hoaxes, so how can you tell? judesedit Aug 2022 #11

Deep throat attribution...follow the money Moostache Aug 2022 #13

Yup. Where there's smoke there's fire. Joinfortmill Aug 2022 #45

I agree with your assessment up to the point of implying when Trump says it's a hoax, that's true. msfiddlestix Aug 2022 #14

I certainly didn't intend to suggest that his claiming its a hoax would be true. onenote Aug 2022 #36

With Trump you can ALWAYS count your chickens before they hatch! ElementaryPenguin Aug 2022 #15

Your point in general is a good one iemanja Aug 2022 #16

Thanks for your concern. orangecrush Aug 2022 #17

Especially since everyone knows the "good stuff"..... jaxexpat Aug 2022 #18

... orangecrush Aug 2022 #46

We should be pushing every negative angle we can against the fascists just like they do to US yaesu Aug 2022 #19

My worry is that somebody in Trump's circle planted that, to make the actual crime not seem so bad. Greg K Aug 2022 #20

All I know for sure is Mr.Bill Aug 2022 #21

Good observation! n/t ewagner Aug 2022 #23

Thank you. Despite knowing the creature we're dealing with yonder Aug 2022 #22

Philip Rucker, the editor on this piece in the WaPo, did say on MSNBC Bev54 Aug 2022 #24

Best case scenario JMCKUSICK Aug 2022 #25

Thank you. The word "nuclear" definitely excites people, often... NNadir Aug 2022 #26

Every part of this story has triggered a wave of assumptions not yet supported..... brooklynite Aug 2022 #27

The speculation here on DU is disappointing... kirby Aug 2022 #28

Good short analysis. Thank you Escurumbele Aug 2022 #29

I've even seen it hinted the real evidence got buried with Ivana. appleannie1 Aug 2022 #30

I never count Traildogbob Aug 2022 #31

Except Merritt Garland. He knows what we know and we know that if not much of Ninga Aug 2022 #32

You never know! LeftInTX Aug 2022 #33

traiotr might not know what he has Marthe48 Aug 2022 #34

Finger prints on the papers could tell a story? pwb Aug 2022 #37

Very wise to not make assumptions and jump to conclusions. liberalla Aug 2022 #39

I think even "nuclear weapons" is facts not in evidence FBaggins Aug 2022 #40

latest story says nuclear weapons LymphocyteLover Aug 2022 #43

OTOH, it all makes sense for why the DOJ would take this unprecedented step LymphocyteLover Aug 2022 #41

latest clearly says "nuclear weapons" LymphocyteLover Aug 2022 #42

Agree. But my $ is on there were nuclear docs in the box. Joinfortmill Aug 2022 #44