General Discussion

fasttense

(17,301 posts)

44. Exactly Tom

Sun Nov 4, 2012, 07:38 AM

Nov 2012

I've wondered what Nate would do and say if his projections turn out to be almost 100% wrong after the election. Would he admit to vote rigging then? Is he implying he's going to call the rigging of a national presidential election biased polling? Really? All those polls he uses to get his predictions (that have been accurate up to this election) and he's going to say they were all biased against poor, poor Romney?

I would like to see him, just once, call an obviously rigged election what it really is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WOW: Nate Silver Took A Huge Shot Against Mainstream Political Pundits In His... [View all] WillyT Nov 2012 OP

He does not suffer fools gladly. GentryDixon Nov 2012 #1

+1. '..abandon the pretense that your goal is to inform rather than entertain the public.' freshwest Nov 2012 #33

The pundits have been going after him a lot more this time around, and I think he's fed up with it. FVZA_Colonel Nov 2012 #38

And mainstream punditry is chock full of fools. JHB Nov 2012 #48

Nor should he tavalon Nov 2012 #56

CBS last night wryter2000 Nov 2012 #2

Nate does not suffer fools like Schieffer at all. speedoo Nov 2012 #8

255? So they have Ohio with Obama exboyfil Nov 2012 #9

Apparently in pundit world, 15 = 64 fujiyama Nov 2012 #14

Flat out - D v R framing Cosmocat Nov 2012 #16

Yup, its the math stupid. riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #36

Math is not their strong point. We already know this! mnhtnbb Nov 2012 #52

Yeah, but pundits say stupid things for a living, and freepers generlly just do it as a hobby. n/t D23MIURG23 Nov 2012 #58

This is very healthy; the pundits are useless BeyondGeography Nov 2012 #3

Once again... txdemsftw Nov 2012 #4

Indeed. BouzoukiKing Nov 2012 #12

VERY good point. calimary Nov 2012 #23

Not just any math. ARITHMETIC! Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #34

Exactly. TahitiNut Nov 2012 #42

Then again, briv1016 Nov 2012 #43

He's under attack as much as Obama. Charlie Rose "prosecuted" him. SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2012 #5

at least two possibilties to Romney win Melissa G Nov 2012 #6

If Nate wanted to back up his numbers with what the chance Dustlawyer Nov 2012 #45

As I heard someone point out the pundits predictions are less reliable than a coin toss Anthony McCarthy Nov 2012 #7

Assuming Obama has Ohio exboyfil Nov 2012 #17

On This Weeks Geo Stephanopolis INdemo Nov 2012 #57

Nate Silver doesn't just aggregate polls, they get put through his own software which JaneyVee Nov 2012 #10

wooooooo! that's got to smart for the jackasses like Ed and Tweets and Rach. Whisp Nov 2012 #11

Nonsense davekriss Nov 2012 #20

^^^ This is correct ^^^ oswaldactedalone Nov 2012 #31

^^^That is incorrect^^^ Whisp Nov 2012 #51

and ... media please stop ... Democrats4All Nov 2012 #13

If I have read or heard SLIGHT Cosmocat Nov 2012 #15

Welcome to DU, Democrats4All! calimary Nov 2012 #24

I'll bet 10 thousand dollars that Obama wins (n/t) thesquanderer Nov 2012 #18

Nate Silver is partially wrong TomClash Nov 2012 #19

Exactly Tom fasttense Nov 2012 #44

LOL! Folks, it's all about the MONEY! Up2Late Nov 2012 #21

Getting a dose of fox news without my consent and it's an alternate universe there mountain grammy Nov 2012 #26

It's not just Fox pscot Nov 2012 #49

spoken like the endearing nerd that he is. Hamlette Nov 2012 #22

"Shotsfired", huh? Well, then Cha Nov 2012 #25

Nate makes a **HUGE** error here. garybeck Nov 2012 #27

Yes, good point dreamnightwind Nov 2012 #30

Fraud. nt riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #37

He basically says that the only way Mitt Romney wins RomneyLies Nov 2012 #28

Republicans and their pundits felix_numinous Nov 2012 #29

Wait til they find out Mr. Silver used to write on DailyKos. blkmusclmachine Nov 2012 #32

Dear MSM: Please "inform rather than entertain." Thank you. n/t Beartracks Nov 2012 #35

Nate Silver is the man. I'd love to meet him and shake his hand. dorksied Nov 2012 #39

He is like the Moneyball guy only with polling. Taking on conventional wisdom and improving Quixote1818 Nov 2012 #40

k&r n/t RainDog Nov 2012 #41

GOOD, Becasue the mainstream pundits are more or less irrelevant Iggy Nov 2012 #46

Interesting take, considering that he never once mentioned "mainstream political pundits"! George II Nov 2012 #47

The newz is just another TV show... heppcatt Nov 2012 #50

Nate Silver may have forgotten a few things lobodons Nov 2012 #53

oooga booga! the sky is falling!! MjolnirTime Nov 2012 #55

Does Nate factor in turnout? cilla4progress Nov 2012 #54