Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(46,110 posts)

1. Because being appointed by a particular president doesn't require a judge to recuse

Tue Aug 30, 2022, 07:11 AM

Aug 2022

themselves from a case in which that president is a party.

Never has.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm wondering why the judge in the Nara-Lago case [View all] BlueGreenLady Aug 2022 OP

In the nonprofit legal work I do NJCher Aug 2022 #3

A very detail-oriented meltdown Kid Berwyn Aug 2022 #6

The cast of characters! rubbersole Aug 2022 #8

Ummm inthewind21 Aug 2022 #9

Well I guess the first one wasn't grateful enough Walleye Aug 2022 #10

No he didn't. MrsCoffee Aug 2022 #11

I read this here at DU gab13by13 Aug 2022 #7

Because inthewind21 Aug 2022 #12