General Discussion

ancianita

(43,415 posts)

51. THIS. Clear proof of guilt of seditious conspiracy.

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Tue Oct 4, 2022, 08:30 AM

Oct 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

***Per DOJ filing: missing White House call logs found at MAL*** [View all] pnwmom Oct 2022 OP

Oh boy, here we go. OAITW r.2.0 Oct 2022 #1

Ah. Correlating the callers/callees, with timelines. Hmmm. empedocles Oct 2022 #4

You're a poet and don't know it! 😉 ShazzieB Oct 2022 #42

I'm hearing Gil Scott Heron. Harker Oct 2022 #57

Good one! calimary Oct 2022 #65

But even though they are TFG phone records while pRes. THEY STILL BELONG TO THE PEOPLE, yes? TigressDem Oct 2022 #69

This is interesting! Ocelot II Oct 2022 #2

You think he made 39 pages of calls on 1/6? Effete Snob Oct 2022 #12

I'm not *assuming* anything. What I think is interesting, though, Ocelot II Oct 2022 #13

The notes are probably the interesting part Effete Snob Oct 2022 #16

Of course not 39 pages but I bet some are. triron Oct 2022 #22

He a narcissist. He probably ogles over them like family photos, proving how clever he was... Pobeka Oct 2022 #30

Exactly! It's so telling, that he didn't destroy evidence that would make him look bad NullTuples Oct 2022 #40

Yes, why? Could have just flushed them and destroyed possibly incriminating records? Evolve Dammit Oct 2022 #58

Who says only calls from the 6th are missing? druidity33 Oct 2022 #15

I would assume the "white house" call logs Cosmocat Oct 2022 #55

He didn't make that many calls InstantGratification Oct 2022 #56

I would assume the "white house" call logs Cosmocat Oct 2022 #62

I wonder whether the committee will add this to the next hearing or have a whole extra one renate Oct 2022 #3

Definitely. 2 days after the next one. OAITW r.2.0 Oct 2022 #5

Has the next been rescheduled? dweller Oct 2022 #6

Nothing set in stone yet. chowder66 Oct 2022 #19

Tentative date dweller Oct 2022 #21

Is there a time of day for that hearing? wnylib Oct 2022 #53

Jan 6 committee doesn't have this moosewhisperer Oct 2022 #50

K&R. Wednesdays Oct 2022 #7

Not surprising. sheshe2 Oct 2022 #8

glad there are people willing to be lawyers Tetrachloride Oct 2022 #9

WHEN DOES THIS MF GET ARRESTED?!?! evolves Oct 2022 #10

Utterly nothing in that filing connects that material with 1/6 Effete Snob Oct 2022 #11

Neither does the OP. She's posting a tweet... druidity33 Oct 2022 #17

Thanks. And the person who tweeted is asking some valid questions, IMHO. n/t pnwmom Oct 2022 #18

Connect the dots? ⁹ triron Oct 2022 #25

Kick this one. Kingofalldems Oct 2022 #14

YUGE!!! COL Mustard Oct 2022 #20

Why would they be privileged? LiberalFighter Oct 2022 #23

Some might be attorney-client privileged, if they were between Trump and a private attorney. pnwmom Oct 2022 #29

Whaaa?!?! You gotta be shitting me! dchill Oct 2022 #24

Sorry to be junvenile but........Lock him up! Lock Him up! kimbutgar Oct 2022 #26

Actually, I consider that to be a MATURE response..... MyOwnPeace Oct 2022 #31

Do I remember correctly that, unlike real presidents, he refused to release call niyad Oct 2022 #27

That's what I remember, too, at least about visitor logs. nt pnwmom Oct 2022 #28

I might understand a copy... Grins Oct 2022 #32

Twitter reply: Rhiannon12866 Oct 2022 #33

If any of the notes on the logs refer to communications with DT's private lawyers, they could be pnwmom Oct 2022 #38

IANAL, but an attorney and client who conspire to commit a crime lose A/C privilege. usonian Oct 2022 #45

That's true -- but it wouldn't happen automatically. It would have to be litigated. pnwmom Oct 2022 #46

I plead double IANAL. The metadata of all calls made on duty (the who and when) may be public info. usonian Oct 2022 #47

Yes, the metadata. But I specifically mentioned "notes." n/t pnwmom Oct 2022 #48

Sorry, it's late. Thx. usonian Oct 2022 #49

im getting tired of sputter sputt sputt , delay and so fourth. when are we going AllaN01Bear Oct 2022 #34

When DOJ gets ready I guess. triron Oct 2022 #35

TY.. I trust the DOJ & Not Cha Oct 2022 #44

Thanks for the link to the pdf! Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2022 #36

If it walks like a duck... Ford_Prefect Oct 2022 #37

Sounds like the DOJ is being super cautious not to break any rules regarding atty/client privilege? kentuck Oct 2022 #39

Yeah, that's what I got out of it too -- but reading the filing, there is nothing specific about KPN Oct 2022 #61

Big K&R! Bayard Oct 2022 #41

Educated Guess that DT did Cha Oct 2022 #43

THIS. Clear proof of guilt of seditious conspiracy. ancianita Oct 2022 #51

K&R spanone Oct 2022 #52

How many calls did he make to Putin? speak easy Oct 2022 #54

The very fact that he said he didn't want to return these because they would end up... SKKY Oct 2022 #59

Um, could someone please ARREST THIS GODDAMNED FUCKING CRIMINAL??? Blue Owl Oct 2022 #60

He will be indicted, there's no question. But unfortunately it will take more time because they LymphocyteLover Oct 2022 #67

Obvious obstruction moniss Oct 2022 #63

Very interesting! burrowowl Oct 2022 #64

Shit just got even more real LymphocyteLover Oct 2022 #66

Obstruction of Justice...,. Smackdown2019 Oct 2022 #68