Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Rees-Mogg move to axe 2,400 laws is 'anti-democratic', say legal experts [View all]
Laws that could disappear include ban on animal testing, workers rights and environmental protectionshttps://www.theguardian.com/law/2022/oct/24/post-brexit-proposals-mean-2400-laws-could-disappear-lawyers-warn
Leading lawyers have sounded the alarm over Jacob Rees-Moggs proposals for post-Brexit legislation that could result in 2,400 laws disappearing overnight including a ban on animal testing for cosmetics, workers rights and environmental protections. Lawyers including one former UK government legal official who designed the concept of EU-retained law for Theresa May branded the move as anti-democratic and completely barking.
Swathes of laws including equal pay for men and women, pension rights for same-sex married couples, food standards and aviation safety rules could accidentally disappear or be redrafted poorly, they warn. The retained EU law (revocation and reform) bill will get its second reading on Tuesday. It was designed in such a way that 47 years of laws devised during EU membership will be switched off on 31 December 2023 under a so-called sunset clause.
A lot of laws are going to be changed without any scrutiny at all by a dying government that few people respect, said George Peretz KC, a specialist in European law. The Unison general secretary, Christina McAnea, said: This is a countdown to disaster for all working people. It would mean turning the clock back to Dickensian times when workers had no rights.
In a financial crisis with a headless government, people need stability and support, not a bonfire of numerous employment rights. Ministers must act now to reassure everyone that hard-won protection wont be shredded. A free-for-all giving the green light to unscrupulous bosses is not the route to economic growth. All of this is deeply objectionable on two grounds it is anti-democratic and it is anti-growth, said Peretz, pointing out that employers need legal certainty on employment laws, technical standards and other matters before expanding or investing.
snip
the most punchable face in Parliament

41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rees-Mogg move to axe 2,400 laws is 'anti-democratic', say legal experts [View all]
Celerity
Oct 2022
OP
I think progressives can do better than amping up violence with "punchable face". . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#1
Violence will not solve the CONservative problem, and violence is funny only in RoadRunner cartoons
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#5
So progs who get upset when Cons make cartoons about hunting Pelosi are "so out of line"?
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#8
Then where is the line? Some references to polical violence okay but other such references not?
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#18
Again you play a strawman. I made no reference to jail or punishment for casual references.
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#30
Ah, personal attacks... the final argument of those who have none. "Hint" your strawman
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#35
That is not a personal attack. Your comments are consistent with self-sanctimony toward the
hlthe2b
Oct 2022
#37
You are one with BOTH-siderism. I say NO SIDE acceptable for casual references to political violence
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#20
Apparently you don't know what "both-siderism" means either. Maybe google next time
hlthe2b
Oct 2022
#23
Clearly you think my no-siderism is the same as both-siderism. Take your own advice. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#27
Strawman. I make NO equation btwn real political violence & casual reference to political violence
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#26
NO ONE on this thread agrees with you. Maybe think about THAT before you start accusing other DUers
hlthe2b
Oct 2022
#28
Self-deprecating humour is universally admired. Farage is definitely not on our side
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#33
I was first to rec OP. Mogg's despicable end-run is against wishes of majority of the electorate.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#39
I don't think I'd call him "libertarian". I think he's an extreme Catholic, probably loves ...
JustABozoOnThisBus
Oct 2022
#38
And again, Carlin to the rescue.... Rees-Mogg. Carlin, (Paraphrasing) --And what's with it now
3Hotdogs
Oct 2022
#25
or go short. "Sting" always had a good ring to it... "Pink"; keep it simple. "Prince", etc.
Evolve Dammit
Oct 2022
#40