Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rees-Mogg move to axe 2,400 laws is 'anti-democratic', say legal experts [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)1. I think progressives can do better than amping up violence with "punchable face". . . . nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rees-Mogg move to axe 2,400 laws is 'anti-democratic', say legal experts [View all]
Celerity
Oct 2022
OP
I think progressives can do better than amping up violence with "punchable face". . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#1
Violence will not solve the CONservative problem, and violence is funny only in RoadRunner cartoons
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#5
So progs who get upset when Cons make cartoons about hunting Pelosi are "so out of line"?
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#8
Then where is the line? Some references to polical violence okay but other such references not?
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#18
Again you play a strawman. I made no reference to jail or punishment for casual references.
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#30
Ah, personal attacks... the final argument of those who have none. "Hint" your strawman
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#35
That is not a personal attack. Your comments are consistent with self-sanctimony toward the
hlthe2b
Oct 2022
#37
You are one with BOTH-siderism. I say NO SIDE acceptable for casual references to political violence
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#20
Apparently you don't know what "both-siderism" means either. Maybe google next time
hlthe2b
Oct 2022
#23
Clearly you think my no-siderism is the same as both-siderism. Take your own advice. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#27
Strawman. I make NO equation btwn real political violence & casual reference to political violence
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#26
NO ONE on this thread agrees with you. Maybe think about THAT before you start accusing other DUers
hlthe2b
Oct 2022
#28
Self-deprecating humour is universally admired. Farage is definitely not on our side
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#33
I was first to rec OP. Mogg's despicable end-run is against wishes of majority of the electorate.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#39
I don't think I'd call him "libertarian". I think he's an extreme Catholic, probably loves ...
JustABozoOnThisBus
Oct 2022
#38
And again, Carlin to the rescue.... Rees-Mogg. Carlin, (Paraphrasing) --And what's with it now
3Hotdogs
Oct 2022
#25
or go short. "Sting" always had a good ring to it... "Pink"; keep it simple. "Prince", etc.
Evolve Dammit
Oct 2022
#40