Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

usonian

(23,165 posts)
Wed Nov 9, 2022, 05:36 PM Nov 2022

California massively rejects sports betting. (Adding a data point or two) [View all]

Both propositions lost by over 70/30 margins.
A little history of corruption in sports may (IMO) have had something to do with this.
Read about Tim Donaghy if you weren’t aware of NBA game fixing by referees.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25980368/how-former-ref-tim-donaghy-conspired-fix-nba-games

Sports talk people (who are heavily sponsored by sports wagering “advisors” ) are pretty livid.

Time for Tom Tolbert, who spends a great deal of air time discussing “the spread” (And I don’t mean mayonnaise) and what’s “got value”. Oh yes, “gambling good”

He says that people were afraid that CA would turn into Biff Tannen’s Pleasure Palace on every block. No, Tom. You’ll have to go to Reno or LasVegas to indulge your habit.

As quickly as the radio went on, it goes off!

The thing that intrigued me was that two cards showed up in my mailbox. One against prop 26 and the other against prop 27. It sure looks like each proponent spent a fortune ($571 million!) running down the other, and they were both successful!

Just an observation. I’d like to see a team named “The Spread” so that announcers can say: “So and so team beat The Spread” and confuse gamblers.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Legal betting Zeitghost Nov 2022 #1
Turning every cell phone into a microtransaction betting device is probably a bad idea. Initech Nov 2022 #2
So you support illegal gambling and the business of bookmakers ZonkerHarris Nov 2022 #12
No I don't. Initech Nov 2022 #15
Everyone who voted against these props made the bookies happy. Those apps are in business ZonkerHarris Nov 2022 #16
I think I need to do more research on this subject. Initech Nov 2022 #17
There's nothing like supporting bookies and black markets. Better to have no regulations no taxes ZonkerHarris Nov 2022 #3
Those who live outside of CA would scarcely believe the flood of advertising Just A Box Of Rain Nov 2022 #4
I haven't seen or heard any Zeitghost Nov 2022 #5
Seeing the ballot was the first time I'd even heard of the measures Sympthsical Nov 2022 #8
It was crazy! And I believe they started the ads in AUGUST! beaglelover Nov 2022 #6
It was probably similar to flood of ads from the sports books after sports gaming was legalized... Ace Rothstein Nov 2022 #7
The apps are partnered with the sports leagues ZonkerHarris Nov 2022 #13
Even the teams as well. Ace Rothstein Nov 2022 #14
Seriously! It's like a fresh spring morning without the din of petronius Nov 2022 #9
Red herrings, distractions, bullshit, and balderdash mostly hvn_nbr_2 Nov 2022 #10
LA already has Las Vegas and most people illegally sports bet online that want to do it Johonny Nov 2022 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California massively reje...