General Discussion

uponit7771

(93,532 posts)

14. With Watergate it was less than a year after crimes were found. I think that's the part that needs

Reply to inthewind21 (Reply #10)

Fri Nov 18, 2022, 04:28 PM

Nov 2022

... to be addressed with this SC.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] oxymoron Nov 2022 OP

Why? SheltieLover Nov 2022 #1

Why did 20 Republicans vote to confirm him? gab13by13 Nov 2022 #2

Good point. oxymoron Nov 2022 #3

Because MAGA doesn't want what America is selling, that's why they'll never see anything done here uponit7771 Nov 2022 #11

Unfortunately for Ms Wine-Banks maxrandb Nov 2022 #4

Thank you. And, before he goes down, GoCubsGo Nov 2022 #16

"This Special Counsel drags out his misery even longer" what we need to understand is that the Escurumbele Nov 2022 #20

If I interpret her message correctly, she feels it is a waste of time because the prosecutors Escurumbele Nov 2022 #17

True Donny Dipshit supporters make up about 20-30% of his voters maxrandb Nov 2022 #26

Why do I care what trump supporters think? Wingus Dingus Nov 2022 #5

Wut? oxymoron Nov 2022 #7

... Wingus Dingus Nov 2022 #8

+1, some are going into hyper defense mode uponit7771 Nov 2022 #12

Do you know who she is? Escurumbele Nov 2022 #18

Garland cares, I believe she said that thinking about Garland who seems to want to be seen Escurumbele Nov 2022 #22

I think it's good for DOJ to appear non-partisan, because this shouldn't be political. Wingus Dingus Nov 2022 #38

exactly. give your evidence to a grand jury and get the fucker indicted. Takket Nov 2022 #6

Exactly. I don't understand the need. oxymoron Nov 2022 #9

THIS !! 👉🏾👉🏾👉🏾 ".. here's a hint: THEY HATE YOU.." uponit7771 Nov 2022 #13

I admire inthewind21 Nov 2022 #10

With Watergate it was less than a year after crimes were found. I think that's the part that needs uponit7771 Nov 2022 #14

Nailed it republianmushroom Nov 2022 #15

I hope Ms Banks doesn't consider DOJ's committment to impartiality Beastly Boy Nov 2022 #19

How about a spine to prosecute crimes. They might find that useful JCMach1 Nov 2022 #23

Have you looked into DOJ record of prosecuting crimes? Beastly Boy Nov 2022 #25

Have you looked into how they prosecute other top secret document theft cases? onecaliberal Nov 2022 #30

This confirms that you are only looking into DOJ prosecuting the crimes of your interest Beastly Boy Nov 2022 #41

This confirms that you cannot accept that the DOJ is not treating dump the way they HAVE onecaliberal Nov 2022 #43

The entire content of your reply (23) was, and I quote: Beastly Boy Nov 2022 #44

You must be talking to someone else. Please read my reply, onecaliberal Nov 2022 #45

I just know they are punting a timely prosecution which ends up JCMach1 Nov 2022 #31

Likewise, the knowledge you claim is of dubious factual foundation Beastly Boy Nov 2022 #42

She is correct. DOJ slow walk has accomplished nothing JCMach1 Nov 2022 #21

No one here knows enough to call what the DOJ's been doing a "slow walk." Just the daily ancianita Nov 2022 #35

She is incorrect. Jack Smith already works for the DOJ and who cares what Trump supporters see. ancianita Nov 2022 #24

VP of HCA stands out. They're the for-profit behemoth carving out America's health care system. TheRickles Nov 2022 #32

What bearing does that have on this case. Nothing. ancianita Nov 2022 #34

Exactly my point. Given all the other laudable places he's worked, this one is a surprise. TheRickles Nov 2022 #36

Well, what do you make of his overall body of legal work? It "exudes integrity." Glad we agree. ancianita Nov 2022 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author TheRickles Nov 2022 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author orangecrush Nov 2022 #27

God let's hope not. oxymoron Nov 2022 #28

That's for sure orangecrush Nov 2022 #29

Yep. I remember "written" answers instead of in-person interrogations... Justice matters. Nov 2022 #39

This isn't about convincing any dump supporters of anything !!!!!!!! GuppyGal Nov 2022 #40