Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

boston bean

(36,781 posts)
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 07:44 PM Nov 2022

Justice delayed is Justice denied. [View all]

If any other person brought home classified docs they would be charged within 6 months and in jail within a year.

I am conflicted about this SP.

I am also getting very impatient and angry about all these special considerations being made for political reasons.

If they have enough to charge. Charge. Damned be the outcome.

My gawd it cannot be this difficult.

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice delayed is Justice denied. [View all] boston bean Nov 2022 OP
Garland is passing the buck. triron Nov 2022 #1
Right there with ya, boston bean. calimary Nov 2022 #2
Be careful how you post.😊 gab13by13 Nov 2022 #3
They spent 18 months trying to negotiate a return because he is "Donald trump". boston bean Nov 2022 #5
I would not mind so much, if they felt they could not move to charge him, DemocraticPatriot Nov 2022 #63
I don't think they will indict so long as he is a presidential candidate. kentuck Nov 2022 #72
Consider Pantagruel Nov 2022 #4
Doesn't matter. Air tight means shit. If you are worried about his cultists. Air tight means shit to boston bean Nov 2022 #7
Who cares about his cultists? ShazzieB Nov 2022 #58
☝️☝️☝️☝️ PortTack Nov 2022 #8
+1 gulliver Nov 2022 #14
Ask reality winner. onecaliberal Nov 2022 #25
Garland is blowing smoke out his ass, because Emile Nov 2022 #6
I think so, too. He should have already been indicted. Goodheart Nov 2022 #11
Damned be the outcome? DOJ should rush ahead because some people on the internet are having a sad? tritsofme Nov 2022 #9
Nobody asked DOJ to rush, gab13by13 Nov 2022 #13
+++. You were right when you called it a year ago JohnSJ Nov 2022 #21
That "rush ahead" train has left the station. Scrivener7 Nov 2022 #18
You know that's a red herring, right? Please tell me that you know that's a red herring. Orrex Nov 2022 #60
Were it up to me... Kid Berwyn Nov 2022 #10
Two sets of laws, one for the uber wealthy/powerful and the other for little people RANDYWILDMAN Nov 2022 #12
Actually Nixon did get his. He resigned in disgrace. Ford pardoned him because he wrongly thought JohnSJ Nov 2022 #20
That's a damn good point. Goodheart Nov 2022 #27
We suffered Raygun, Bush and Bush/Cheney crimes as well. FoxNewsSucks Nov 2022 #44
That narrative has become about Trump but what about those that PufPuf23 Nov 2022 #64
Thanks for that. MOMFUDSKI Nov 2022 #29
When your dealing with someone like Trump, yes it is this difficult gay texan Nov 2022 #15
It already has been screwed up. The fact that a SC wasn't appointed a year ago is evidence of that JohnSJ Nov 2022 #17
Seems to me that we were getting these exact same warnings a year ago. Goodheart Nov 2022 #26
He sure is, a BS artist Iwasthere Nov 2022 #61
2years, and now someone has the bright idea, why not appoint a SC, so there is No appearance of JohnSJ Nov 2022 #16
Yep. Scrivener7 Nov 2022 #19
Silly me to think that there's been plenty enough time to have already included these investigations Goodheart Nov 2022 #23
And 10 x OOJ cases in weasel Mueller million-dollars report in the recycle bin. Justice matters. Nov 2022 #46
I think you are correct. To me it is obvious they (DOJ) are trying any way possible walkingman Nov 2022 #24
me too. barbtries Nov 2022 #22
Bookmarking for later. revmclaren Nov 2022 #28
lol Cha Nov 2022 #62
Garland was appointed Attorney General precisely to make such difficult decisions about Trump sop Nov 2022 #30
this needs to be handled by the AG not some unknown dude from NY Blues Heron Nov 2022 #31
Chief War Crimes Prosecutors are not phased by orange anuses. Get real. Your lack of knowledge Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #33
He is joe random to 99 percent of Americans Blues Heron Nov 2022 #34
Who gives a damn if 99 pc of Americans don't know him. They will never FORGET him. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #35
It matters, its important that the AG be the one, not this unknown guy. Blues Heron Nov 2022 #37
It matter not one whit to him doing his job whether 99 pc know him or not. Not one scintilla. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #39
right, its only the most unprecedented crimes of a sitting president against the US Blues Heron Nov 2022 #41
Random? You have a foregone conclusion that Garland is weak and you warp everything around that Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #40
Too bad bro Blues Heron Nov 2022 #42
Serious people like Laurence Tribe think Smith is the exact OPPOSITE of a "rando" Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #45
it just looks really weak Blues Heron Nov 2022 #47
You aren't serious. I keep making references & you keep repeating nebulous preconceived opinions. nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #49
you keep making ad hominems - why? Blues Heron Nov 2022 #50
I addressed your points and you addressed none of mine. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #52
I hope your right, it looks bad though Blues Heron Nov 2022 #54
Shabby debating technique how you repeatedly misrepresent him as not American Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #51
He is in the Hague right now Bernardo Blues Heron Nov 2022 #53
It's a nice trite phrase that has some truth, but is basically lazy binary all-or-nothing thinking.n Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #32
"No one is above the law" is just a motto and not reality. republianmushroom Nov 2022 #36
All these richies' prove you totally wrong. And these are just 1/10 of 2 weeks of cases. ancianita Nov 2022 #48
how long has trump been breaking the law ? republianmushroom Nov 2022 #59
Miss me with your fact free cynicism. Factually answer your own questions for once. ancianita Nov 2022 #66
Joshua Schulte wasn't indicted for espionage for 3 years, and not convicted for 2 years after that Fiendish Thingy Nov 2022 #38
Actually, we're all going to wait and wait and wait whether we like it or not. old guy Nov 2022 #55
Did Schulte brag publicly and repeatedly about his espionage? Orrex Nov 2022 #71
"...[not] One rule for the powerful and another for the powerless..." RockRaven Nov 2022 #43
There are only a handful of similarly situated people. Ms. Toad Nov 2022 #56
When I make a similar point, I am attacked, belittled, and condescended to Orrex Nov 2022 #57
+1 Emile Nov 2022 #68
+1 Goodheart Nov 2022 #70
Well stated. sop Nov 2022 #74
Please explain how justice was "delayed". brooklynite Nov 2022 #65
Ah, yes. The Dictionary Gambit Orrex Nov 2022 #69
I think it's time to see Meowmee Nov 2022 #67
We'll know soon enough what, if anything, will happen to Trump. sop Nov 2022 #75
If that happens Meowmee Nov 2022 #77
"Charge. Damned be the outcome." bigtree Nov 2022 #73
This Treefrog Nov 2022 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice delayed is Justic...