Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This savvy, manipulative, 4D-chess-playing rationale is at odds with the by-the-book, no other RockRaven Nov 2022 #1
Good question. The cache of gov docs at MAL is... brush Nov 2022 #2
You nailed it: MyOwnPeace Nov 2022 #4
If you read the emptywheel tweets, there is no way anybody can indict for about 30 days or more Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #19
Looks like he did it again. Wish DOJ would stay a step ahead of him for a change. brush Nov 2022 #21
They have. They got it on a fast-track. tRump's special master ploy got blown up. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #22
That makes sense, especially since it appears that the coup attempt involved sitting members. mjvpi Nov 2022 #3
TY.. that is scary for Dt! Cha Nov 2022 #5
My impression is: This new sheriff is not going to accept these "Oh yeah? Whaddyagonna do about it!" NBachers Nov 2022 #13
That is an insight that calms my own reaction as makes good sense. kr PufPuf23 Nov 2022 #6
I'm For AG Garland & Jack Smith's Cha Nov 2022 #7
Yes. Indicting a former president is not like serving up a TV dinner. speak easy Nov 2022 #8
And, from what I've read Cha Nov 2022 #11
+1 treestar Nov 2022 #18
+1 speak easy Nov 2022 #26
Same here. Let the adults do their work so it sticks. we can do it Nov 2022 #23
TY, we can do it! nt Cha Nov 2022 #27
Thanks for helping keep hope alive! Blue Owl Nov 2022 #28
YVW! & I Hope I'm Cha Nov 2022 #33
only details about its budget... SledDriver Nov 2022 #9
Maybe if it takes longer than a year Metaphorical Nov 2022 #16
I think McCarthy could try to defund all of DoJ, but not specific expenditures Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #20
Post removed Post removed Nov 2022 #10
Well, that's good, but... LudwigPastorius Nov 2022 #12
They'd get the evidence in discovery anyway, once indictments were filed. n/t pnwmom Nov 2022 #15
+1000. nt pnwmom Nov 2022 #14
That's important, speak easy. brer cat Nov 2022 #17
No Benghazi for you :) speak easy Nov 2022 #24
LOL brer cat Nov 2022 #25
I have seen thousands of posts about Trump since the Jan. 6th events. former9thward Nov 2022 #29
1. Because Republicans did not control the House speak easy Nov 2022 #30
No one knows who Jack Smith is. former9thward Nov 2022 #31
You asked "why didn't people call for a SC before it was announced" speak easy Nov 2022 #32
Should we give up and let Trump go? Kingofalldems Nov 2022 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No Benghazi for you. Why ...»Reply #17