Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

19. If you read the emptywheel tweets, there is no way anybody can indict for about 30 days or more

Reply to brush (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 19, 2022, 07:55 AM

Nov 2022

... due to certain legal machinations that tRump set in motion. They have to play out at upcoming court dates before ANYBODY CAN LEGALLY examine the documents to see what tRump intermixed with what.

tRump will lose, but the delays are all on tRump, who is a master of delay.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No Benghazi for you. Why AG Garland appointed a Special Counsel. [View all] speak easy Nov 2022 OP

This savvy, manipulative, 4D-chess-playing rationale is at odds with the by-the-book, no other RockRaven Nov 2022 #1

Good question. The cache of gov docs at MAL is... brush Nov 2022 #2

You nailed it: MyOwnPeace Nov 2022 #4

If you read the emptywheel tweets, there is no way anybody can indict for about 30 days or more Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #19

Looks like he did it again. Wish DOJ would stay a step ahead of him for a change. brush Nov 2022 #21

They have. They got it on a fast-track. tRump's special master ploy got blown up. . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #22

That makes sense, especially since it appears that the coup attempt involved sitting members. mjvpi Nov 2022 #3

TY.. that is scary for Dt! Cha Nov 2022 #5

My impression is: This new sheriff is not going to accept these "Oh yeah? Whaddyagonna do about it!" NBachers Nov 2022 #13

That is an insight that calms my own reaction as makes good sense. kr PufPuf23 Nov 2022 #6

I'm For AG Garland & Jack Smith's Cha Nov 2022 #7

Yes. Indicting a former president is not like serving up a TV dinner. speak easy Nov 2022 #8

And, from what I've read Cha Nov 2022 #11

+1 treestar Nov 2022 #18

+1 speak easy Nov 2022 #26

Same here. Let the adults do their work so it sticks. we can do it Nov 2022 #23

TY, we can do it! nt Cha Nov 2022 #27

Thanks for helping keep hope alive! Blue Owl Nov 2022 #28

YVW! & I Hope I'm Cha Nov 2022 #33

only details about its budget... SledDriver Nov 2022 #9

Maybe if it takes longer than a year Metaphorical Nov 2022 #16

I think McCarthy could try to defund all of DoJ, but not specific expenditures Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #20

Post removed Post removed Nov 2022 #10

Well, that's good, but... LudwigPastorius Nov 2022 #12

They'd get the evidence in discovery anyway, once indictments were filed. n/t pnwmom Nov 2022 #15

+1000. nt pnwmom Nov 2022 #14

That's important, speak easy. brer cat Nov 2022 #17

No Benghazi for you :) speak easy Nov 2022 #24

LOL brer cat Nov 2022 #25

I have seen thousands of posts about Trump since the Jan. 6th events. former9thward Nov 2022 #29

1. Because Republicans did not control the House speak easy Nov 2022 #30

No one knows who Jack Smith is. former9thward Nov 2022 #31

You asked "why didn't people call for a SC before it was announced" speak easy Nov 2022 #32

Should we give up and let Trump go? Kingofalldems Nov 2022 #34