Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(33,424 posts)

6. If you are looking at "names" that people know the convictions mean very little.

Tue Nov 29, 2022, 07:55 PM

Nov 2022

The DOJ is going after a few people that entered the building but little evidence they are looking elsewhere.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Two found guilty of "seditious conspiracy" - what does it mean? [View all] kentuck Nov 2022 OP

"close contact with Roger Stone" Takket Nov 2022 #2

Or an STD! The Stones are apparently 'swingers.' emulatorloo Nov 2022 #4

I'm sure it exposed lots of connections underpants Nov 2022 #3

So, you are suggesting the convictions should be thrown out? Effete Snob Nov 2022 #5

A recurring theme in DU posts on this trial... Effete Snob Nov 2022 #8

Expect the convictions to be appealed Locutusofborg Nov 2022 #7

It means the Feds have proven it actually was sedition tinrobot Nov 2022 #9