Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The empty top secret folders found in Trumps desk. [View all]Captain Zero
(8,914 posts)51. Yep. Con man gets conned.
The sting.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hard to believe no one was administratively responsible for the President's documents
dutch777
Dec 2022
#7
Yes. People in far less important jobs have much more stringent paperwork rules/laws.
Irish_Dem
Dec 2022
#10
I had read for YEARS that such special docs were hand delivered by a courier (my word) and that....
machoneman
Dec 2022
#14
And I have gotten to the point where I do not care what happens to him or his followers...
kentuck
Dec 2022
#12
Everything he touches fails. He loses all the time. He is in a constant state of fixing his failures
fightforfreedom
Dec 2022
#62
tRump is never brilliant. He is CLEVER with social media (incl. TV show) and Other People's Money.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#31
If you had been following the news... you'd know it is NOT Garland's decision
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#32
I yawn at the attack on person, not dealing with facts or law of SC Smith role. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#59
Only the SC can indict, at this point. Garland can veto it, but can't indict. Must say if nixes. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#56
As to your last sentence, thx for backhanded compliment, but persuasion rooted in mistakes fails.
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#66
Think of the metaphorical branch as received and I will consider your advice carefully. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#72
Garland has veto only; required to say so if doing so. Indictment power has been transferred. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#57
That is my understanding. I think Smith inherits ongoing grand jury and investigation, re step 1. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#75
Nope. At this point he can only nix SCounsel indictments & must say so. He can't indict, only SC. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2022
#54
maybe he was asked to get specific docs and took others and/or folders to create a diversion
Blues Heron
Dec 2022
#21
I can imagine Trump doing something like this, don't laugh he is capable of doing this.
fightforfreedom
Dec 2022
#39