Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(22,680 posts)
22. That's not a worry of mine.
Tue Dec 20, 2022, 04:34 PM
Dec 2022

Take a look at what Garland said when he announced the appointment of Smith as special counsel. Here's a brief excerpt:

"Today, I signed an order appointing Jack Smith to serve as special counsel. The order authorizes him to continue the ongoing investigation into both of the matters that I have just described and to prosecute any federal crimes that may arise from those investigations."

Later, he added the following: "As special counsel, he will exercise independent prosecutorial judgment to decide whether charges should be brought."

The full text of Garland's statement is available in multiple sources. I'm quoting from this source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/11/18/transcript-merrick-garland-jack-smith-special-prosecutor/10728962002/

It sounds to me like Smith has been given a great deal of independence, including the authority to prosecute as he sees fit. Nowhere does Garland say Smith won't be able to prosecute someone without Garland's approval, and saying he will "exercise independent prosecutorial judgment to decide whether charges should be brought" indicates the opposite to me.

I have a hard time imaging why Garland would go to the trouble of appointing such a uniquely qualified person to do this job and make such a point of emphasizing the special prosecutorial authority he's been given, if he did not intend to allow Smith to fully exercise that authority.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's encouraging. Vinca Dec 2022 #1
Thanks for the article, very interesting. emulatorloo Dec 2022 #2
I really hope we will get a Smithmas nt spooky3 Dec 2022 #3
tenuous analogy bigtree Dec 2022 #4
This is probably why Garland appointed him, and not somebody else. GoCubsGo Dec 2022 #5
Jack Smith, Giantslayer GenXer47 Dec 2022 #6
Nice! H2O Man Dec 2022 #8
Ooh loving this! flying_wahini Dec 2022 #13
This is good! n/t ms liberty Dec 2022 #14
Someone caught that scene on their smart phone Uncle Joe Dec 2022 #15
Recommended. H2O Man Dec 2022 #7
Daily Beast has been doggin' this story about Jack Smith FakeNoose Dec 2022 #9
We shall see, time will tell republianmushroom Dec 2022 #10
I hope Smithmas is better than Fitzmas IronLionZion Dec 2022 #11
Correct me if I am wrong but I thought it will still be Garland's decision as to charging trump. Katinfl Dec 2022 #12
What scares you about it? wnylib Dec 2022 #16
Depends on how long Smith takes. There are only 13 months until the Rethug primaries start. Garland Celerity Dec 2022 #18
Smith is working quickly. I very much doubt wnylib Dec 2022 #24
Indictment sooner rather than later? Slgal64 Dec 2022 #26
Add a 'boo hoo' from me, too. Welcome! marble falls Dec 2022 #27
Smith will make recommendations to Garland based on sealed indictments from Justice matters. Dec 2022 #19
Incorrect. Smith will present HIS decisions, and then Garland will personally sign off on them. ancianita Dec 2022 #20
That's not a worry of mine. ShazzieB Dec 2022 #22
Looks like AG Garland made the correct choice. ProudMNDemocrat Dec 2022 #17
YES musclecar6 Dec 2022 #21
May Smith sweep through the Trump crowd with the scythe of justice, Emrys Dec 2022 #23
So, Garland intentionally called in a president hunter lame54 Dec 2022 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jack Smith Has a History ...»Reply #22