Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(40,111 posts)

12. One also doesn't have the right to put others at risk

Tue Dec 27, 2022, 08:11 AM

Dec 2022

Survivalists and preppers talk about werewolves. Those who plan on surviving disasters by taking , by force if need be, what they need from others.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If there's any scenario where you value property over lives [View all] Ex Lurker Dec 2022 OP

Property can be replaced, people cannot Walleye Dec 2022 #1

People who have lost everything in a fire always PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2022 #2

I work in a position where this is a reality bottomofthehill Dec 2022 #3

What kind of "artifacts"? old as dirt Dec 2022 #5

Notre Dame had "holy relics" and iconic art. TigressDem Dec 2022 #6

I can see it, then. old as dirt Dec 2022 #7

The risk of human life to save "things" is an easy analysis for me bottomofthehill Dec 2022 #8

Some things are not just "things". old as dirt Dec 2022 #9

True TigressDem Dec 2022 #11

After re-reading, I think the poster is talking about looting. bottomofthehill Dec 2022 #4

Looting vs Finding ret5hd Dec 2022 #10

One also doesn't have the right to put others at risk Kaleva Dec 2022 #12

What if that property is what is keeping me or loved ones alive? NutmegYankee Dec 2022 #13

Yes, in the not-too-distant future. Dysfunctional Dec 2022 #14

+1000 roamer65 Dec 2022 #16

save Hitler or my guitar from a burning building? prodigitalson Dec 2022 #15