Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Genki Hikari

(1,766 posts)
79. You do realize that there are a bunch of sources
Wed Jan 4, 2023, 11:19 AM
Jan 2023

This person could have who aren't DOJ.

People who appear before grand juries can talk about their impressions of the testimony they had to give. Their attorneys can talk about it as well, if the client allows.

There are literally hundreds or even thousands of people associated with cases who gossip like a sieve--court employees, administrative staff of law firms, and so on. Legal investigators for defense attorneys and intrepid reporters know to frequent the favorite off-duty hangouts of those working indirectly on cases, to eavesdrop on their shop talk over lunch or drinks for any interesting nuggets they might inadvertently reveal. And they all do the shop talk thing.

I haven't known the DOJ people to leak, but oh boy do I know about the adjunct staff leaking. I dated a defense attorney and he was one of those who had a private investigator on his staff who did the eavesdrop thing on prosecution staff, to get a heads up on an important case.

I could also tell you some hair-raising stories about some of the things they do during jury voir dire to eliminate witnesses. Let's just say that anyone sitting in the viewing galleries could be the person analyzing your body language, speech patterns and other profiling criteria to signal an attorney yea or nay on accepting you as a juror.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 months and counting republianmushroom Jan 2023 #1
But not so long with the documents case. Wednesdays Jan 2023 #5
It would be nice to know how long the gov't knew the doc's. were missing republianmushroom Jan 2023 #9
If they're degrading in a toilet sewer or up in fumes in a fireplace... Justice matters. Jan 2023 #20
it is strange republianmushroom Jan 2023 #24
Does this displease you? What are your expectations? Hekate Jan 2023 #36
No, it displeases others for me to post about it though. republianmushroom Jan 2023 #39
Tsk Hekate Jan 2023 #41
It's not something I think about, personally. ShazzieB Jan 2023 #52
mine have. republianmushroom Jan 2023 #86
We get it... Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #18
the question is how high will my counting have to go ? republianmushroom Jan 2023 #21
As high as necessary - until they are done Lucinda Jan 2023 #28
so it shall be then republianmushroom Jan 2023 #33
Gee, for me the question is... Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #42
Be surprised you get more of a response other than "like", from this poster... asiliveandbreathe Jan 2023 #46
And another question why not. Why does the statement 0f a count bother you.? republianmushroom Jan 2023 #85
beginning to look a lot like one of those 'T' things -(nt)- stopdiggin Jan 2023 #53
That's been my speculation for awhile now. NBachers Jan 2023 #65
It does, doesn't it? wnylib Jan 2023 #91
Thank you PJMcK Jan 2023 #72
This message was self-deleted by its author republianmushroom Jan 2023 #84
+1 MontanaMama Jan 2023 #51
Honestly? That is lightning fast. Warpy Jan 2023 #58
Good Ohio Joe Jan 2023 #2
Sc Smith is said to be back in the States... let the games begin! SheltieLover Jan 2023 #3
did you get a "when"?! barbtries Jan 2023 #4
As I said, I didn't press him as to what "soon" meant. PCIntern Jan 2023 #7
you're a good guy barbtries Jan 2023 #10
If he knew he would have told me. PCIntern Jan 2023 #26
Bless you, my dear, for passing along this info. fierywoman Jan 2023 #6
Thanks!! Sogo Jan 2023 #8
How often do you talk to this person? I hope we get updates when you do FakeNoose Jan 2023 #11
Yeah. Tell him you made a mistake on his tooth and you need him back in the chair. 3Hotdogs Jan 2023 #62
Interesting conversation indeed ... phoenix75 Jan 2023 #12
I'll vouch for you. I know you don't make stuff up. tavernier Jan 2023 #13
K&R Emile Jan 2023 #14
Yes Yes. Yes! malaise Jan 2023 #15
May it be so Wild blueberry Jan 2023 #16
Off topic PC but I have to share BOSSHOG Jan 2023 #17
Great stuff! PCIntern Jan 2023 #22
Ugh says the old Expos fan joemacdawson Jan 2023 #40
You went to a great High School Joe BOSSHOG Jan 2023 #43
Haha. Expos never knew "how to win" until the 94 strike. joemacdawson Jan 2023 #60
Thanks for posting this Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #19
That's what my friend said in November Tree Lady Jan 2023 #23
Pardon me, respectfully, but "no overtime" and "working hard" don't occupy the same universe. jaxexpat Jan 2023 #77
❤️ ✿❧🌿❧✿ ❤️ Lucinda Jan 2023 #25
Dubious Trumpdumper Jan 2023 #27
Common misconception PCIntern Jan 2023 #30
Not the same Trumpdumper Jan 2023 #32
Ok PCIntern Jan 2023 #75
+1 nt JoeOtterbein Jan 2023 #44
Agreed. NorCalBlue Jan 2023 #74
That tracks with my non professional take grantcart Jan 2023 #29
My take as well. One day we wake up to find that TFG took a plea and was sentenced before we hear Pepsidog Jan 2023 #89
The classified documents case is so solid ... usonian Jan 2023 #31
You/we can't get everything but getting something solid can be a significant accomplishment. keithbvadu2 Jan 2023 #34
Thank you! Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #35
Thank you and your friend very much Hekate Jan 2023 #37
Thanks for sharing the encouraging anecdote. Martin68 Jan 2023 #38
Because it is you - and I trust you - I share my secret prayer Mira Jan 2023 #45
That would be a dream come true! phoenix75 Jan 2023 #49
So no confidentiality? Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #47
I am able to present cases of a clinical or behavioral nature PCIntern Jan 2023 #70
That's interesting, thanks for explanation. Would love your Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #78
Well, PCIntern Jan 2023 #80
Yes. Just think it was and is a phenomenon that occured Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #81
Entirely possible... PCIntern Jan 2023 #82
Reassuring, and here's hoping your friend is right. nt crickets Jan 2023 #48
And I thought your last post was enlightening! Better Days Ahoy Jan 2023 #50
The information is perfectly in line with what the analysts are saying - soldierant Jan 2023 #54
Be still my heart! WinstonSmith4740 Jan 2023 #55
So once again I was right, DOJ does leak. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #56
You do realize that there are a bunch of sources Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #79
Gerry Spence, perhaps? A HERETIC I AM Jan 2023 #57
Interesting... PCIntern Jan 2023 #66
...K&R... spanone Jan 2023 #59
Ty for a possible heads up. And Happy New Year! electric_blue68 Jan 2023 #61
Thank you. This news made me smile ecstatic Jan 2023 #63
Recommended. H2O Man Jan 2023 #64
Your friend said the insurrection case would be difficult to prove. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #67
My question is : WTF is it difficult? triron Jan 2023 #87
The difficulty is in having concrete evidence wnylib Jan 2023 #92
Thank you. Putting 🥂 in the icebox to chill. Ilsa Jan 2023 #68
Nice bdamomma Jan 2023 #69
I sincerely hope he's right Maeve Jan 2023 #71
This is encouraging to read. Niagara Jan 2023 #73
Thank you! dixiechiken1 Jan 2023 #76
Totally agree! GA & Stealing Govt docs!. Also Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #83
I'm cautiously optimistic MiKenMi33 Jan 2023 #88
Where can an impartial jury be found? The Wizard Jan 2023 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OK...I may have some "new...»Reply #79