Gaetz talking about "purity" is sorta like Taylor-Greene lecturing on chastity. nt

[Caliman73]

8. I think "Fidelity" might have been a better choice...

Chastity has an implication that women should not be sexual beings, while men are "free to roam".

I have no problem with Greene having sex with whoever and however many people she wants, the hypocrisy, and her disgustingness is how she lectures people on being "moral" when she has been unfaithful to the vows of monogamy she made with her partner. I don't care if she is "chaste" or not. That she is not true to her word is way worse to me. I hold the same view for men. People can have sex with whoever and however many people they want to, but when you make a commitment to be with only your partner, when you don't honor that, you are showing a lack of character and honesty.

If you are in an open relationship and have an understanding, and the parties involved are all consenting, then go for it, do whatever you fancy. Relationships (all relationships) are based on trust. If I sell you my car, you trust that I am not selling you a piece of crap with structural, engine, or transmission problems. If I have sold crappy cars to other people in the past and You as a buyer know this, then you have EVERY right to not trust me. Same with any other relationship. Greene cannot be trusted. She has no loyalty and no ethical or moral compass. Same as Gaetz. They are both POS.