Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Re: Jack Smith [View all]sheshe2
(96,885 posts)36. They aren't just starting.
Google works wonders:
Smith and his new team have inherited the January 6 probe at a crucial juncture, as the public has a better understanding of the lengths the former president and his allies went to try to keep Trump in the Oval Office but also as congressional investigators hit the limits of their powers.
And where the House select committee hit brick walls in its probe including with recalcitrant witnesses who claimed privileges, or, like Mark Meadows, bailed on cooperating with congressional investigators midway through DOJ prosecutors now working under Smith will have certain tools to dismantle those barriers. They include ongoing legal proceedings about piercing the shield of confidentially that normally surrounds a president.
The special counsel also has a massive amount of evidence already in-hand that it now needs to comb through, including evidence recently turned over by the House January 6 committee, subpoena documents provided by local officials in key states and discovery collected from lawyers for Trump allies late last year in a flurry of activity, at least some of which has not even been reviewed yet, according to sources familiar with the investigation.
Smith himself sent subpoenas to election officials in seven battleground states and received a trove of material. Included in the response from Michigans secretary of state is an email from a county official who was reporting two voicemails they received in December 2020 from individuals seeking access to voting equipment. One callcame from someone claiming to work for Trumps post-election legal team, the clerk wrote.
And where the House select committee hit brick walls in its probe including with recalcitrant witnesses who claimed privileges, or, like Mark Meadows, bailed on cooperating with congressional investigators midway through DOJ prosecutors now working under Smith will have certain tools to dismantle those barriers. They include ongoing legal proceedings about piercing the shield of confidentially that normally surrounds a president.
The special counsel also has a massive amount of evidence already in-hand that it now needs to comb through, including evidence recently turned over by the House January 6 committee, subpoena documents provided by local officials in key states and discovery collected from lawyers for Trump allies late last year in a flurry of activity, at least some of which has not even been reviewed yet, according to sources familiar with the investigation.
Smith himself sent subpoenas to election officials in seven battleground states and received a trove of material. Included in the response from Michigans secretary of state is an email from a county official who was reporting two voicemails they received in December 2020 from individuals seeking access to voting equipment. One callcame from someone claiming to work for Trumps post-election legal team, the clerk wrote.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/06/politics/january-6-justice-department-jack-smith-trump-investigation/index.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yup i hope michael moore is right - those insurrectionists got it coming to them.
onetexan
Jan 2023
#55
I remember Mueller. What a disappointment and travesty of justice that was.
liberalmuse
Jan 2023
#14
Will the un-redacted report ever be viewed by "We the People?" Never saw the Iraq torture report,
Evolve Dammit
Jan 2023
#67
Probably will only know who, and when, when the subpoenas start flying..
asiliveandbreathe
Jan 2023
#15
I bet the nightly consumption of Ambien goes up a lot on K St. and around DC in general.
BobTheSubgenius
Jan 2023
#21
Well, I'll still hope but it seems a bit late to be starting investigations of Congress members.
Hermit-The-Prog
Jan 2023
#24
was wondering today- how long does it usually take to prosecute a case like this?
mopinko
Jan 2023
#41
Now this opens all possibilities. Get a few of the crazies out of the House, call for the election
Vinca
Jan 2023
#58
It'll be hilarious if they are expecting people to comply with their subpoenas while ignoring others
ColinC
Jan 2023
#69
I predict Dems will comply as they are legal instruments and Dems believe in the law.
Evolve Dammit
Jan 2023
#71