Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Re: Jack Smith [View all]

sheshe2

(96,885 posts)
36. They aren't just starting.
Fri Jan 6, 2023, 10:09 PM
Jan 2023

Google works wonders:

Smith and his new team have inherited the January 6 probe at a crucial juncture, as the public has a better understanding of the lengths the former president and his allies went to try to keep Trump in the Oval Office but also as congressional investigators hit the limits of their powers.

And where the House select committee hit brick walls in its probe – including with recalcitrant witnesses who claimed privileges, or, like Mark Meadows, bailed on cooperating with congressional investigators midway through – DOJ prosecutors now working under Smith will have certain tools to dismantle those barriers. They include ongoing legal proceedings about piercing the shield of confidentially that normally surrounds a president.

The special counsel also has a massive amount of evidence already in-hand that it now needs to comb through, including evidence recently turned over by the House January 6 committee, subpoena documents provided by local officials in key states and discovery collected from lawyers for Trump allies late last year in a flurry of activity, at least some of which has not even been reviewed yet, according to sources familiar with the investigation.

Smith himself sent subpoenas to election officials in seven battleground states and received a trove of material. Included in the response from Michigan’s secretary of state is an email from a county official who was reporting two voicemails they received in December 2020 from individuals seeking access to voting equipment. One callcame from someone claiming to work for Trump’s post-election legal team, the clerk wrote.



https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/06/politics/january-6-justice-department-jack-smith-trump-investigation/index.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Re: Jack Smith [View all] sheshe2 Jan 2023 OP
K&R UTUSN Jan 2023 #1
"of Congressional members..." brer cat Jan 2023 #2
It sure does, brer. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #8
Yeah, that part made me go, "Oooh!" 😁 ShazzieB Jan 2023 #28
Listen to "Ultra". The podcast by Rachel Maddow. Vdizzle Jan 2023 #50
Dont you love Ultra? So good! Cant wait to see the movie onetexan Jan 2023 #53
...K&R... spanone Jan 2023 #3
Oopsie. rubbersole Jan 2023 #4
Yup i hope michael moore is right - those insurrectionists got it coming to them. onetexan Jan 2023 #55
Wow! I hope this scares them! Tree Lady Jan 2023 #5
I think you are right. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #9
LOL i'm sure they w try to investigate the investigator onetexan Jan 2023 #54
They will do anything to stop this. PlutosHeart Jan 2023 #49
Biden's admin is in charge & doj is independent of House oversight onetexan Jan 2023 #56
Kevin is vulnerable soldierant Jan 2023 #51
Excellent, she... TY & Rt! 💙 Cha Jan 2023 #6
I actually got a twitch of excitement with this post!!! Bev54 Jan 2023 #7
we shall see republianmushroom Jan 2023 #10
Just to clarify when they say Congressional do they mean both House and Senate? PA_jen Jan 2023 #11
Don't know, but I found this: sheshe2 Jan 2023 #12
thanks PA_jen Jan 2023 #13
That report says nothing about investigating members of congress. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #25
You know, you could use google as well. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #31
"A New Phase" msfiddlestix Jan 2023 #60
I remember Mueller. What a disappointment and travesty of justice that was. liberalmuse Jan 2023 #14
"Disappointment" doesn't even come close to describing it........ MyOwnPeace Jan 2023 #29
Bill Barr was the reason for most of our disappointment FakeNoose Jan 2023 #63
Will the un-redacted report ever be viewed by "We the People?" Never saw the Iraq torture report, Evolve Dammit Jan 2023 #67
Mueller had to deal with Rosenstein and Barr. moonscape Jan 2023 #78
Probably will only know who, and when, when the subpoenas start flying.. asiliveandbreathe Jan 2023 #15
:) sheshe2 Jan 2023 #33
K&R! gademocrat7 Jan 2023 #16
Investigate, investigate. PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2023 #17
I think they REALLY blew a great opportunity today........ MyOwnPeace Jan 2023 #32
The DOJ cannot simply put people on trial Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #74
Multiple felonies. PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2023 #75
Kick. N/T Upthevibe Jan 2023 #18
KNR niyad Jan 2023 #19
Hey, we take over the House once babylonsister Jan 2023 #20
IKR? sheshe2 Jan 2023 #34
I bet the nightly consumption of Ambien goes up a lot on K St. and around DC in general. BobTheSubgenius Jan 2023 #21
Please let us know when the investigations end and arrests begin nightwing1240 Jan 2023 #22
Is there another source for this report? Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #23
Yes. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #35
Well, I'll still hope but it seems a bit late to be starting investigations of Congress members. Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2023 #24
They aren't just starting. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #36
Thank you. I misread your OP. Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2023 #38
Thanks, Hermit. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #39
I think we've already frustrated Putin, at least Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2023 #48
THIS!!☝️ onetexan Jan 2023 #57
Justice is coming and these traitors know it. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #26
I never heard of that guy before. James48 Jan 2023 #27
The OnTheFritz Tweet is a screenshot. So.. dchill Jan 2023 #30
Google is your friend. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #37
Good efforts to lead horses to water Better Days Ahoy Jan 2023 #44
This news definitely makes tonight's proceedings a little easier to take. nt crickets Jan 2023 #40
was wondering today- how long does it usually take to prosecute a case like this? mopinko Jan 2023 #41
Agreed. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #43
Kicking! Get it done, Mr. Smith. calimary Jan 2023 #42
YES!! SunSeeker Jan 2023 #45
Loose bowel time for the traitors Schmice3 Jan 2023 #46
Yup. This shit show is not forever! SheltieLover Jan 2023 #47
Second best news all week. Nt ecstatic Jan 2023 #52
Now this opens all possibilities. Get a few of the crazies out of the House, call for the election Vinca Jan 2023 #58
Are happy days are here again just around the corner? GreenWave Jan 2023 #59
Smith's plan is coming into focus. housecat Jan 2023 #61
Hence a new House rule: dalton99a Jan 2023 #62
However, read this re The Holman Rule. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #64
Finally!! Irishxs Jan 2023 #65
Will they comply with subpoenas?? And what will happen if they don't? Evolve Dammit Jan 2023 #66
It'll be hilarious if they are expecting people to comply with their subpoenas while ignoring others ColinC Jan 2023 #69
I predict Dems will comply as they are legal instruments and Dems believe in the law. Evolve Dammit Jan 2023 #71
Yeah I think we just miiiiight see a Dem house before the next election ColinC Jan 2023 #68
Be still my heart. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #70
So he's JUST starting to put a team together Sewa Jan 2023 #72
Only those members have had over 2 years to bury the evidence. jaxexpat Jan 2023 #73
I like where this is going. Kid Berwyn Jan 2023 #76
Now that is priceless! sheshe2 Jan 2023 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re: Jack Smith»Reply #36