General Discussion

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)

23. That is what I think and wouldn't it be sweet to catch them!

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Wed Jan 11, 2023, 01:42 PM

Jan 2023

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, is there any reason to believe those ten documents found at an old [View all] Baitball Blogger Jan 2023 OP

They were planted by a MAGAT. Meadowoak Jan 2023 #1

I've wondered the same. The coincidence and timing is just far too convenient. n/t RKP5637 Jan 2023 #2

Or...just spitballing here... brooklynite Jan 2023 #5

Come on brooklynite!!! Caliman73 Jan 2023 #10

I Buy This Completely RobinA Jan 2023 #22

Yep, I think that's pretty much what has happened. In the past probably not too big a deal and would RKP5637 Jan 2023 #37

New Year; New Conspiracy Theory..... brooklynite Jan 2023 #3

Maybe the Secret Service itself IS the problem. live love laugh Jan 2023 #4

When you need a conspiracy theory to prove a conspiracy theory..... brooklynite Jan 2023 #8

Do you deny this reporting? If so, please cite your reasons why. W_HAMILTON Jan 2023 #26

‼️ I'm implying Biden's not doing his job ⁉️ live love laugh Jan 2023 #46

+1 Meadowoak Jan 2023 #40

Maybe the problem is at the Archives? Captain Zero Jan 2023 #51

Wasn't it at one of his old offices that wasn't being used? Maraya1969 Jan 2023 #6

That's how I understood it. Baitball Blogger Jan 2023 #15

the secret service is infested with MAGATS. Meadowoak Jan 2023 #7

✔️ live love laugh Jan 2023 #47

✔️ live love laugh Jan 2023 #48

Erm, are you suggesting these documents were Baitball Blogger Jan 2023 #16

An old Biden office betwee nis veep stint and 2020 presibential run. It was being cleaned out. brush Jan 2023 #31

It could have been done. I was unaware that it was in the white house...that changes everthing Demsrule86 Jan 2023 #29

See post 31. brush Jan 2023 #32

was it SS protected dsc Jan 2023 #42

I believe the docs were planted. OLDMDDEM Jan 2023 #9

Beliefs are not facts. TheProle Jan 2023 #12

I realize Beliefs are not facts OLDMDDEM Jan 2023 #14

When an actual Democratic leader makes this claim, I'll consider it..... brooklynite Jan 2023 #17

I seriously doubt they were planted. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2023 #21

Maybe but maybe not. Demsrule86 Jan 2023 #25

Dirty trickster Roger Stone comes to mind. brush Jan 2023 #34

I also believe it's a nothingburger. ananda Jan 2023 #13

Ten is a nice round number EYESORE 9001 Jan 2023 #11

Yup. And the information has to be limited to the Obama years. Baitball Blogger Jan 2023 #20

and statistically its as likely to be the number as every other number. onenote Jan 2023 #27

Statistics only play a role if the number of documents is random EYESORE 9001 Jan 2023 #50

Except it turns out more documents found elsewhere onenote Jan 2023 #52

It's one more than nine EYESORE 9001 Jan 2023 #53

And what about the number of documents found at Biden's home. onenote Jan 2023 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #18

They weren't just lying around in an old office, Sogo Jan 2023 #19

Not sure that makes me feel any better exboyfil Jan 2023 #41

That is what I think and wouldn't it be sweet to catch them! Demsrule86 Jan 2023 #23

I think you're on to something. Consider the timing... brush Jan 2023 #24

Then why wasn't the story leaked before the election. onenote Jan 2023 #28

It's no fun if ya don't have fun with the predictable republican... brush Jan 2023 #36

Yes, would have boosted the "tsunami." moondust Jan 2023 #33

The Biden administration immediately notified NARA. It would have Meadowoak Jan 2023 #44

Exactly. Magats assumed Dems would do what they would do. brush Jan 2023 #49

That's been my suspicion all along. I wouldn't put it past the GQP. Vinca Jan 2023 #30

I would doubt Bayard Jan 2023 #35

How I would laugh if there was something on the White House plumbing. Baitball Blogger Jan 2023 #39

The oldest classified document dates from 1917 (declassified in 2011) exboyfil Jan 2023 #43

They should check video surveillance to see who has been there. SheltieLover Jan 2023 #38

Do we really need a CT for this? Bonx Jan 2023 #45