Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

emulatorloo

(46,155 posts)

10. Clickbait title. And a really really bad hot take.

Reply to Post removed (Original post)

Fri Jan 13, 2023, 09:36 AM

Jan 2023

Pretty sure Garland does not believe that.

But you do win the internet today w the clickbait hot take.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jan 2023 OP

And a lot of people here seem to be cool with that Bettie Jan 2023 #1

Do you think Biden is unfit because he's keeping an AG who thinks he's a criminal? Kaleva Jan 2023 #21

No, but I think he may be too trusting Bettie Jan 2023 #35

I'm not! Biden didn't even know about those papers being there. ananda Jan 2023 #27

That's ridiculous. yardwork Jan 2023 #2

+++ emulatorloo Jan 2023 #5

I highly doubt Biden would do that, because that would imply interference with the DOJ. However, JohnSJ Jan 2023 #11

I forget which news anchor said it. "But will the American people be able to tell the difference Walleye Jan 2023 #14

Exactly, and that won't happen JohnSJ Jan 2023 #16

Yeah, that's too much like work Walleye Jan 2023 #18

Nope. They won't. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #36

And they have, according to the news media I've seen brooklynite Jan 2023 #37

Garlands true colors are starting to show Blues Heron Jan 2023 #3

It looks pretty elephantine to me. ananda Jan 2023 #28

It is highly doubtful Garland believes that, and I believe this is done purely for political JohnSJ Jan 2023 #4

+++ emulatorloo Jan 2023 #8

Absolutely bucolic_frolic Jan 2023 #12

What will happen when no charges are filed against President Biden? gab13by13 Jan 2023 #22

Then Let Him Indict Trump This Afternoon, Sir, For Political Considerations The Magistrate Jan 2023 #19

Well said gab13by13 Jan 2023 #25

The goal is fact-finding, not indictment no_hypocrisy Jan 2023 #6

He sure isn't sitting on his laurels................... he's working secondwind Jan 2023 #7

News alert, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #30

I don't think so. MLAA Jan 2023 #9

So then Garland lied about not being partisan? gab13by13 Jan 2023 #34

Clickbait title. And a really really bad hot take. emulatorloo Jan 2023 #10

Think if Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration had been quicker in clearing the deck exboyfil Jan 2023 #13

Unfortunately, Classified materials being where they were, is probably against the law. mackdaddy Jan 2023 #15

Incorrect Happy Hoosier Jan 2023 #20

It hasn't been determined yet if the taking was deliberate Kaleva Jan 2023 #26

Right, but that's not what the post I replied to said. Happy Hoosier Jan 2023 #32

Ah.... no. Happy Hoosier Jan 2023 #17

Fact President Biden didn't know of these classified documents. Bluethroughu Jan 2023 #23

For the record............ secondwind Jan 2023 #29

I think it's a criminal investigation of a matter, not of a person. eShirl Jan 2023 #24

throw away the key! Shellback Squid Jan 2023 #31

BUT WHY does the DOJ believe that a CRIMINAL investigation is warranted? TigressDem Jan 2023 #33