Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dchill

(42,660 posts)

33. On the other hand, you may be wrong.

Reply to tritsofme (Reply #5)

Thu Jan 26, 2023, 11:00 PM

Jan 2023

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Garland's special counsels: The mistake keeps getting worse (Rubin/WaPo) [View all] BeyondGeography Jan 2023 OP

Garland would have made a good SC justice. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #2

Did you contact the WH if you feel so strongly? Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #4

Cojones. Aka, testes. brush Jan 2023 #22

Someone is in way over their head in this discussion. It's not Garland. tritsofme Jan 2023 #5

On the other hand, you may be wrong. dchill Jan 2023 #33

Yes please Rebl2 Jan 2023 #7

I'm fine with Garland's decision to appoint a SC for Biden Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #3

And How Will You Feel If Jack Smith Says Same Thing Regarding Teflon Man? nt SoCalDavidS Jan 2023 #12

I would be quite surprised Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #13

I Admit, I Can't Predict What Mr. Smith Will Recommend SoCalDavidS Jan 2023 #14

He won't. ShazzieB Jan 2023 #25

Looking closely at the posture of everyone on the stage behind Garland Boomerproud Jan 2023 #6

Look at Wray Rebl2 Jan 2023 #8

Rubin also wrote a column ripping Wray today BeyondGeography Jan 2023 #9

Garland Is Not Going To Indict Teflon Man SoCalDavidS Jan 2023 #10

Indeed! 👍 Duppers Jan 2023 #26

What if the documents found in Biden's home... Cracklin Charlie Jan 2023 #11

well, yes. but that's looking like a bigger and bigger 'what if' stopdiggin Jan 2023 #15

Or those who came to investigate the Biden abodes BOSSHOG Jan 2023 #21

the people that made original 'discoveries' stopdiggin Jan 2023 #37

I think Rebl2 Jan 2023 #16

Maybe it was little green men? tritsofme Jan 2023 #18

Ha Rebl2 Jan 2023 #20

lol.. what you said could Cha Jan 2023 #29

I know Rebl2 Jan 2023 #32

Agree, even though it does seem far out there. wnylib Jan 2023 #34

Garland as much admitted gab13by13 Jan 2023 #17

Yep Rebl2 Jan 2023 #19

No kidding. BigmanPigman Jan 2023 #24

I am called a Garland hater and I am not, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #27

Nonsense Ohio Joe Jan 2023 #39

Nailed it republianmushroom Jan 2023 #23

Maybe not. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #28

Seems like the DOJ needs a "no special counsel, return what you have day" for elected officials.... Sancho Jan 2023 #30

Oh look! Jennifer Rubin is wrong. Again. Just A Box Of Rain Jan 2023 #31

Exactly what is she wrong about, exactly? dchill Jan 2023 #35

"nearly a third of the public (30%)... BWdem4life Jan 2023 #36

Garland "treating entirely different circumstances identically" certainly contributes Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #40

I agree with most everything Rubin writes, usually, but intheflow Jan 2023 #38