Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gab13by13

(32,804 posts)

8. Weissmann and Joyce Vance refuted that today,

Reply to SoCalDavidS (Reply #5)

Fri Feb 10, 2023, 06:39 PM

Feb 2023

saying that most likely this has been adjudicated with Pence's top aides who have testified, and having Pence testify is a similar situation. Joyce Vance said it could take a few months.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jack Smith Isn't At The End Of His Investigations [View all] gab13by13 Feb 2023 OP

First Trump GreenWave Feb 2023 #1

If Smith wants Pence's testimony, it will take 2 cases going maxsolomon Feb 2023 #2

SCOTUS has already ruled on Trump's EP privilege claims Fiendish Thingy Feb 2023 #4

The Supreme Court will not be involved in this ruling. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #6

Weissman is pathetic on this bigtree Feb 2023 #3

Garland isn't investigating, Smith is. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #7

meaningless to what I wrote. Weissman is ass-covering wrong. Again. bigtree Feb 2023 #10

Jack Smith did not leak the subpoena. No evidence of that, so why spread that here? bigtree Feb 2023 #11

Harry Litman Said That If Pence And/Or Teflon Man Claim Privilege, It Will Delay Things For 8 Months SoCalDavidS Feb 2023 #5

Weissmann and Joyce Vance refuted that today, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #8

Vance saying so doesn't mean that's what will happen. maxsolomon Feb 2023 #9