Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bigtree

(94,690 posts)

11. Jack Smith did not leak the subpoena. No evidence of that, so why spread that here?

Reply to gab13by13 (Reply #7)

Fri Feb 10, 2023, 06:49 PM

Feb 2023

...most likely the leak came from the Pence side since he's not obligated to keep it secret like the SC.

What an absurd thing to sling around about the SC.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jack Smith Isn't At The End Of His Investigations [View all] gab13by13 Feb 2023 OP

First Trump GreenWave Feb 2023 #1

If Smith wants Pence's testimony, it will take 2 cases going maxsolomon Feb 2023 #2

SCOTUS has already ruled on Trump's EP privilege claims Fiendish Thingy Feb 2023 #4

The Supreme Court will not be involved in this ruling. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #6

Weissman is pathetic on this bigtree Feb 2023 #3

Garland isn't investigating, Smith is. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #7

meaningless to what I wrote. Weissman is ass-covering wrong. Again. bigtree Feb 2023 #10

Jack Smith did not leak the subpoena. No evidence of that, so why spread that here? bigtree Feb 2023 #11

Harry Litman Said That If Pence And/Or Teflon Man Claim Privilege, It Will Delay Things For 8 Months SoCalDavidS Feb 2023 #5

Weissmann and Joyce Vance refuted that today, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #8

Vance saying so doesn't mean that's what will happen. maxsolomon Feb 2023 #9