Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Absurd censorship:" Changes to Roald Dahl's books spark criticism [View all]Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)43. So you think Dahl was wrong?
Dahl revised Charlie and the Chocolate Factory to address the origin story of the Oompa Loompas in his original first edition.
In the version first published, [the Oompa-Loompas were] a tribe of 3,000 amiable black pygmies who have been imported by Mr. Willy Wonka from the very deepest and darkest part of the African jungle where no white man had been before. Mr. Wonka keeps them in the factory, where they have replaced the sacked white workers.
Dahl changed it:
I created a group of little fantasy creatures . I saw them as charming creatures, whereas the white kids in the books were most unpleasant. It didnt occur to me that my depiction of the Oompa-Loompas was racist, but it did occur to the NAACP and others . After listening to the criticisms, I found myself sympathizing with them, which is why I revised the book.
So, are you also taking issue with him and demanding that the original version be published instead?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, isn't that an interesting conundrum ... which side to come down on if you're liberal
Hugh_Lebowski
Feb 2023
#1
I never self-describe as a liberal, as liberal in most all of the advanced world other than the US
Celerity
Feb 2023
#5
Okay, well if we're only talking about special, marked-as-edited versions provided to schools
Hugh_Lebowski
Feb 2023
#25
I suspected your point was (mostly) the opposite of what the words you were actually saying
Hugh_Lebowski
Feb 2023
#40
I would generally agree with you, but using those texts as is in school
Cuthbert Allgood
Feb 2023
#26
I wish people who know better would stop calling editorial decision "censorship"
unblock
Feb 2023
#3
Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies. nt
Celerity
Feb 2023
#7
Just as Giles Martin changed the Beatles' music with approval of apple, capitol, and parlophone
unblock
Feb 2023
#20
it is far beyond that, but we are not going to agree, so I am dropping out of this from my end
Celerity
Feb 2023
#21
In 1818 a Dr Bowdler published an expurgated version of Shakespeare for children...
Hekate
Feb 2023
#4
Highly edited Golden classics books were easy intro to literature for small children.
haele
Feb 2023
#12
Sure, but what about the students that can't get past it to the discussion?
Cuthbert Allgood
Feb 2023
#29
How old should the reader be? Should each copy come with comprehensive annotations on each page?
Hekate
Feb 2023
#32
Penguin should come up with another Publisher name to print these under - SNOWFLAKE
TheBlackAdder
Feb 2023
#19