Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When it comes to railroad safety, everyone here is missing the forest for the trees. [View all]flashman13
(2,379 posts)34. Dynamic braking has been used since the coming of the diesel electric locomotives.
And like everything else, dynamic braking has evolved and gotten better (You should see those resistor grids burn when one of them shorts out). But in an emergency, dynamic brakes are only going to have the most marginal effect on 120 cars of U.S. grain hurtling down the tracks at 60 MPH. Even with the best brakes in the world that train will take 1-1/2 to 2 miles to stop. Any improvement is good, but the problem is far too large for chipping around the edges with a few technical innovations to make any meaningful difference.
Emergency braking is the last defense against disaster. The key is not in applying the brakes, but in minimizing the number of emergencies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When it comes to railroad safety, everyone here is missing the forest for the trees. [View all]
flashman13
Feb 2023
OP
Why not have the U.S. own the rails like it owns the interstate highway system and then tax those
LiberalArkie
Feb 2023
#13
I guess what I meant was the US owning the rails, repair them, bring them up to euro standards
LiberalArkie
Feb 2023
#18
Nationalization implies that the government also owns the trains, cars and pays the employees
MichMan
Feb 2023
#38
great post and you are right. Southern yellow pine is not the same as oak. Anything to save $.
Evolve Dammit
Feb 2023
#10
There are some concrete ties in service. They are generally on freight lines that also carry
flashman13
Feb 2023
#35
I don't want to be a Debbie Downer here but, we no longer have the will to make big projects happen
flashman13
Feb 2023
#29
Thanks for your response, flashman. Can't hurt to contact one's congresspeople --
diva77
Feb 2023
#42
When I worked for Union Pacific, we were better than most industries in our utilized technology
Gore1FL
Feb 2023
#24
That wasn't my experience in my 15 years of professional service in the industry. nt
Gore1FL
Feb 2023
#56
It kind of depends on exactly what infrastructure and safety you are talking about
Farmer-Rick
Feb 2023
#67
Dynamic braking has been used since the coming of the diesel electric locomotives.
flashman13
Feb 2023
#34
I know, see 2nd last line in my op. Good explanation for others though. n/t
Hiawatha Pete
Feb 2023
#44
AC Locomotives like the AC4400 which use inverter control have better dynamic braking range
Hiawatha Pete
Feb 2023
#58
Your second point is what I was thinking, as well as raising their shipping rate, as well.
JudyM
Feb 2023
#66
Think of all the jobs a federally owned rail system outlet provide. Not to mention
flying_wahini
Feb 2023
#41
I think there is a big difference in how we deal with railroads compared to other countries
tornado34jh
Feb 2023
#68