RW: Experimental software in Ohio won it for Obama [View all]

[cthulu2016]

This site explains how Ohio was stolen.

Some early exit polls told a different story than the actual vote, proving fraud. (The fact that early exit polling changes in light of better evidence subsequently is ignored.)

Polling agreeing with the outcome actually proves fraud. Corrupt pollsters matched their Ohio polls to the fraudulent totals they knew were coming, creating cover for the fraud.

Anecdotal evidence of turnout is preferred to actual turnout because it supports the fraud argument.

It was reported that shortly before the election, an "experimental software patch" was applied to vote tabulation machines in OH. This was done illegally as it had not been officially reviewed by anyone or tested prior to use.

How hard would it be to apply a software patch designed to automatically return a D+8 result? Incredibly easy. Is it also a coincidence that the most far left pollsters were predicting a D+8 electorate for OH despite evidence to the contrary? We call that "creating cover".

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2043301/pg1