Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

tblue

(16,350 posts)

9. Sounds like they speak from experience.

Reply to cthulu2016 (Original post)

Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:57 PM

Nov 2012

I don't care what looks silly. Let's take a look inside those e-voting machines and make the entire process as transparent as possible. It's not that hard and, again, it doesn't matter who thinks it looks silly. Who made thst the standard anyway?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

RW: Experimental software in Ohio won it for Obama [View all] cthulu2016 Nov 2012 OP

Next it's going to be the Tooth Fairy who stole the election for us codjh9 Nov 2012 #1

This election seems so much like 2004 in reverse bluestateguy Nov 2012 #2

Software was installed under the supervision of republican SOS Husted. LisaL Nov 2012 #3

Exactly what I was thinking gollygee Nov 2012 #4

I don't think SOS Husted ever made a decision that would benefit democrats. LisaL Nov 2012 #8

The SoS defended it's use in Federal Court, too... DonViejo Nov 2012 #5

Thank you. tblue Nov 2012 #10

Those people have white nostrils and the whiteness is not from flour. bluestate10 Nov 2012 #6

The software authorized by Ohio's GOP Sec of State? Zambero Nov 2012 #7

Sounds like they speak from experience. tblue Nov 2012 #9

I support this theory. cui bono Nov 2012 #11