General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nicole Wallace is on fire today. She's asking each guest... [View all]bigtree
(94,690 posts)...because she's ignoring the dual grand juries which Garland would be a fool to leap ahead of, or cut off the evidentary process before it's completed.
That's if Garland was actually in charge of this process, instead of the man he hired, Jack Smith. But Whinging Wallace is so gadamn lame she can't even inform her viewers about the actual state of the investigation.
Why is she promoting this made up nonsense about the time taken, and why would anyone expect Garland to leap ahead of the process that's not only underway and ongoing, but reportedly in the end game?
What the fark good is this yammering on about Garland when he's not in control of the process right now, and would be an idiot to interfere to cut it short?
This is dirt-dumbness from Bush's former communication's director.