General Discussion

Ocelot II

(128,761 posts)

13. Precisely. He's pitching it as TFG wanting to protect "the sanctity of his marriage"

Mon Mar 20, 2023, 10:25 AM

Mar 2023

(excuse me for a minute while I laugh hysterically) by sparing Malaria the knowledge that he was shtupping a porn actress while she was home with their new baby. Does anyone really think she didn't know what a horndog her dear hubby was? I'm guessing she was happy not to have to do the horizontal tango with that sweaty orange lump for awhile. And how many times did they interview Cohen, something like 20? He knows exactly why the hush money was paid.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About the potential indictment of the clown [View all] dclarston13 Mar 2023 OP

That's not all of it. That crime becomes a felony if the fraud Ocelot II Mar 2023 #1

+++ Seriously doubt Bragg would go to all this trouble for a misdemeanor. emulatorloo Mar 2023 #3

Exactly. There has to be a lot more to this case. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #5

I think this is why the Tapioca lawyer is saying it was to protect the marriage. Pobeka Mar 2023 #10

Precisely. He's pitching it as TFG wanting to protect "the sanctity of his marriage" Ocelot II Mar 2023 #13

There is something about precedence Trenzalore Mar 2023 #2

If Bragg only indicts Trump for a misdemeanor gab13by13 Mar 2023 #4

Which is why the misdemeanor is only the predicate crime. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #6

I'm placing one of my chips on witness tampering Effete Snob Mar 2023 #8

One would think, yes. Kingofalldems Mar 2023 #12

I think that it's not the severity of punishment, but the certainty of conviction that is deterrent Walleye Mar 2023 #7

I think it will be a felony charge dclarston13 Mar 2023 #9

Glenn K. cilla4progress Mar 2023 #11