Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FakeNoose

(41,701 posts)
10. Yes indeed - but Scott Perry merits his own investigation
Fri Mar 24, 2023, 11:45 AM
Mar 2023

Jack Smith has his hands full just investigating the possible charges against Chump.

Just sayin'

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Meh, it's all just busy work for Jack Smith and the DOJ. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2023 #1
Jack Smith is going for the throat in Trump's theft and most likely selling of our top secret ... Botany Mar 2023 #2
+1 2naSalit Mar 2023 #12
Agree Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #21
Surprising to me that Trump did not appeal gab13by13 Mar 2023 #3
I may be wrong but I thought that if it is a criminal case that Corcoran cannot take the fifth. flying_wahini Mar 2023 #7
Not a lawyer... The only thing I've heard is that he can be given immunity which would eliminate Karadeniz Mar 2023 #9
I heard lawyers discussing the case say Jarqui Mar 2023 #11
How do they know that? wryter2000 Mar 2023 #15
There are reporters at the court house Jarqui Mar 2023 #19
Thanks wryter2000 Mar 2023 #29
The only way that works is if he flips on the toadstool and has receipts. bluesbassman Mar 2023 #16
Apparently, he has audio recordings and transcripts of them and notes Jarqui Mar 2023 #17
My thought too. He got a deal with DOJ and flipped. paleotn Mar 2023 #24
Not sure why that's good. Doesn't that mean that trump Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2023 #28
It proves that Corcoran told them what Trump had told him. Jarqui Mar 2023 #31
Trump said we have no docs here and we searched everywhere. Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2023 #34
It went back and forth a bit Jarqui Mar 2023 #38
Ok. So basically just proving what we already think is true. Conventional Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2023 #43
This: Jarqui Mar 2023 #47
The discussion I heard... 2naSalit Mar 2023 #13
No one has to incriminate themselves Raven123 Mar 2023 #23
Good Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #22
Well said! MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #42
I'd like to fast forward please, I'm tired of the slow burn dumpster fire pace. Arthur_Frain Mar 2023 #4
"Low key devastating" BannonsLiver Mar 2023 #5
meaning some sources and individuals accustomed to downplaying progress of prosecution efforts bigtree Mar 2023 #8
That's what you meant by "low-key devastating"? What a bizarre non-sequitur. Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #27
Respectfully disagree. H2O Man Mar 2023 #30
Yes. But according to the OP writer, that is not what the phrase refers to. Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #32
Right. H2O Man Mar 2023 #33
that's not familiar to me bigtree Mar 2023 #37
There's an interesting H2O Man Mar 2023 #40
what a bizarre thing to obsess on, for you both bigtree Mar 2023 #35
Because of the very strange description of the phrase's meaning for you. That seemed Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #36
we'll, I'll just laugh this one off bigtree Mar 2023 #39
Everyone H2O Man Mar 2023 #41
"low-key devastating" Use On Reddit, Twitter, rogerbert.com, book reviews, etc... MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #44
My comment referred to how the poster said he meant the phrase, which was not Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #46
Missed That - I Just Noticed The Non Sequitur Complaint MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #48
it's not a non-sequitur complaint bigtree Mar 2023 #49
LoL, Happy Friday, It's A Simple Phrase... All Good Y'all MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #50
my wife's the one who likes cooking bigtree Mar 2023 #51
Oh Hell Yeah!! I've Been Gardening Since I Was 8 Years Of Age! MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #53
Please let the second case be for the phone of fascist Scott Perry! lark Mar 2023 #6
Yes indeed - but Scott Perry merits his own investigation FakeNoose Mar 2023 #10
Yeah, it looks like the 2nd person was Mark Meadows and other aides, not a congresscritter. lark Mar 2023 #18
What if he takes the fifth amendment? wryter2000 Mar 2023 #14
That would take a whole hell of a lot of "what's in it for him" to do that. paleotn Mar 2023 #25
Jack is doing good for only 5 months republianmushroom Mar 2023 #20
Yup, old Jack Dan Mar 2023 #55
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2023 #26
I had commented to someone a while back, late one night bigtree Mar 2023 #45
I appreciate your thoughtful commentary Alice Kramden Mar 2023 #54
I have no doubt that Evan Corcoran has PROOF that Chump lied to him about the secret docs FakeNoose Mar 2023 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This day is low-key devas...»Reply #10