General Discussion

bigtree

(94,305 posts)

35. what a bizarre thing to obsess on, for you both

Fri Mar 24, 2023, 02:03 PM

Mar 2023

...it's as if you believe the response is directed to you personally.

Maybe you can explain why you felt compelled to call me out for it, along with the actual person I was responding to?

At any rate, I could very well be wrong about the focus and attention the press and others afford these devastating developments for Trump. Maybe the coverage and attention will turn out to be more amplified than I thought.

Never did I imagine 'low-key' would invite derision, but here we are. Why?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This day is low-key devastating for Trump [View all] bigtree Mar 2023 OP

Meh, it's all just busy work for Jack Smith and the DOJ. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2023 #1

Jack Smith is going for the throat in Trump's theft and most likely selling of our top secret ... Botany Mar 2023 #2

+1 2naSalit Mar 2023 #12

Agree Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #21

Surprising to me that Trump did not appeal gab13by13 Mar 2023 #3

I may be wrong but I thought that if it is a criminal case that Corcoran cannot take the fifth. flying_wahini Mar 2023 #7

Not a lawyer... The only thing I've heard is that he can be given immunity which would eliminate Karadeniz Mar 2023 #9

I heard lawyers discussing the case say Jarqui Mar 2023 #11

How do they know that? wryter2000 Mar 2023 #15

There are reporters at the court house Jarqui Mar 2023 #19

Thanks wryter2000 Mar 2023 #29

The only way that works is if he flips on the toadstool and has receipts. bluesbassman Mar 2023 #16

Apparently, he has audio recordings and transcripts of them and notes Jarqui Mar 2023 #17

My thought too. He got a deal with DOJ and flipped. paleotn Mar 2023 #24

Not sure why that's good. Doesn't that mean that trump Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2023 #28

It proves that Corcoran told them what Trump had told him. Jarqui Mar 2023 #31

Trump said we have no docs here and we searched everywhere. Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2023 #34

It went back and forth a bit Jarqui Mar 2023 #38

Ok. So basically just proving what we already think is true. Conventional Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2023 #43

This: Jarqui Mar 2023 #47

The discussion I heard... 2naSalit Mar 2023 #13

No one has to incriminate themselves Raven123 Mar 2023 #23

Good Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #22

Well said! MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #42

I'd like to fast forward please, I'm tired of the slow burn dumpster fire pace. Arthur_Frain Mar 2023 #4

"Low key devastating" BannonsLiver Mar 2023 #5

meaning some sources and individuals accustomed to downplaying progress of prosecution efforts bigtree Mar 2023 #8

That's what you meant by "low-key devastating"? What a bizarre non-sequitur. Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #27

Respectfully disagree. H2O Man Mar 2023 #30

Yes. But according to the OP writer, that is not what the phrase refers to. Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #32

Right. H2O Man Mar 2023 #33

that's not familiar to me bigtree Mar 2023 #37

There's an interesting H2O Man Mar 2023 #40

what a bizarre thing to obsess on, for you both bigtree Mar 2023 #35

Because of the very strange description of the phrase's meaning for you. That seemed Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #36

we'll, I'll just laugh this one off bigtree Mar 2023 #39

Everyone H2O Man Mar 2023 #41

"low-key devastating" Use On Reddit, Twitter, rogerbert.com, book reviews, etc... MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #44

My comment referred to how the poster said he meant the phrase, which was not Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #46

Missed That - I Just Noticed The Non Sequitur Complaint MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #48

it's not a non-sequitur complaint bigtree Mar 2023 #49

LoL, Happy Friday, It's A Simple Phrase... All Good Y'all MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #50

my wife's the one who likes cooking bigtree Mar 2023 #51

Oh Hell Yeah!! I've Been Gardening Since I Was 8 Years Of Age! MayReasonRule Mar 2023 #53

Please let the second case be for the phone of fascist Scott Perry! lark Mar 2023 #6

Yes indeed - but Scott Perry merits his own investigation FakeNoose Mar 2023 #10

Yeah, it looks like the 2nd person was Mark Meadows and other aides, not a congresscritter. lark Mar 2023 #18

What if he takes the fifth amendment? wryter2000 Mar 2023 #14

That would take a whole hell of a lot of "what's in it for him" to do that. paleotn Mar 2023 #25

Jack is doing good for only 5 months republianmushroom Mar 2023 #20

Yup, old Jack Dan Mar 2023 #55

Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2023 #26

I had commented to someone a while back, late one night bigtree Mar 2023 #45

I appreciate your thoughtful commentary Alice Kramden Mar 2023 #54

I have no doubt that Evan Corcoran has PROOF that Chump lied to him about the secret docs FakeNoose Mar 2023 #52