Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,250 posts)
4. Not unheard of for cops to look the other way based on the speech and debate clause
Sat Mar 25, 2023, 11:54 PM
Mar 2023

One well known incident involved Senator Byrd, who rear ended another car and was initially ticketed, but the cops then decided the ticket should be voided because Byrd was covered by the speech and debate clause. After the story came out, Byrd decided to "waive" the immunity to the extent it was applicable and appeared in traffic court.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1999/07/20/sen-byrd-has-his-day-in-traffic-court/c3c9ff66-487f-47df-96e7-03d46ab016f6/


In Davis's case, his arrest for public drunkenness ought to be considered "breach of the peace" and thus not covered by the immunity.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dean Davis, Oklahoma Stat...»Reply #4