Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NullTuples

(6,017 posts)
49. But then they could define anything they want as "adult entertainment", no?
Sat Apr 1, 2023, 07:56 PM
Apr 2023

Sex education in high school? Adult entertainment.

Books they don't like, such as Huck Finn, Rethinking Columbus, or Maya Angelou's The Heart of a Woman? Adult entertainment.

There are no real constraints, are there?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

+100000000 Meadowoak Apr 2023 #1
The rules protect only the rich and powerful. Irish_Dem Apr 2023 #2
Because "the people" whose rights were enumerated only included straight white intolerant males. Freethinker65 Apr 2023 #3
Well I guess the first amendment doesn't cover things that make teenage boys feel icky Walleye Apr 2023 #4
most teenage boys these days could care less edisdead Apr 2023 #18
I guess I meant to say grown-ass men who never got past being teenage boys Walleye Apr 2023 #19
ah yeah the arrested developed edisdead Apr 2023 #32
I thought claudette Apr 2023 #5
It is. Maybe some misunderstood and thought an all out ban. jimfields33 Apr 2023 #14
What's the damn difference????????? Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #22
The difference claudette Apr 2023 #28
Bad example. The MPA rating system is a voluntary scheme that is not enforced by law Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #37
Sorry but claudette Apr 2023 #38
Emphasis on parents -- not the government. W_HAMILTON Apr 2023 #39
Where are you coming up with "sexual content".?? Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #41
I was referring to claudette Apr 2023 #42
Movies with sexual content can be watched by kids unless the parent prevents it JI7 Apr 2023 #43
Except claudette Apr 2023 #44
There are many movies kids can watch with sexual content as long as they get the ticket JI7 Apr 2023 #46
And that claudette Apr 2023 #47
I will ask you again. WHERE are you coming up with "adult content". Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #52
Tell me claudette Apr 2023 #53
You still haven't answered my question, so I will consider this converstation closed. Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #58
To answer your question claudette Apr 2023 #59
Damn, don't you get it? It NEVER matters WHAT kind of shows they are doing.... Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #62
Well claudette Apr 2023 #63
Understand your point, but seriously doubt that drag "shows" would even think about allegorical oracle Apr 2023 #60
I'm not claudette Apr 2023 #61
The law seems to broadly capture drag, either "male or female inpersonators" In It to Win It Apr 2023 #56
Problem is, some GOP define library reading hour events as "adult" - if the reader is in drag NullTuples Apr 2023 #48
Then that is claudette Apr 2023 #54
You may label it wrong, but they still do so and it matters? NullTuples Apr 2023 #64
IIRC, the law says drag is prohibited in places where it "could be" seen by a minor In It to Win It Apr 2023 #55
It's right wing projection, to take the heat off assault rifles killing children bucolic_frolic Apr 2023 #6
What I don't understand RocRizzo55 Apr 2023 #7
I can explain, by channeling the right-wing patriarchal mindset. yardwork Apr 2023 #12
What's protected by the 1st Amendment? Whatever Repukes say is protected or not protected. paleotn Apr 2023 #8
Of course they are. yardwork Apr 2023 #9
a trump judge couldnt avoid that conclusion. so, yeah, it is. mopinko Apr 2023 #10
Legal hook being used is child abuse? delisen Apr 2023 #11
Nope. Adult entertainment angle. Not outlawed, just forbidden to children. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2023 #25
But then they could define anything they want as "adult entertainment", no? NullTuples Apr 2023 #49
Loosely quoting the Pedobear Party: "blah blah blaah something about the children blah blah blah" TheBlackAdder Apr 2023 #13
they can. barbtries Apr 2023 #15
Because right wing men get funny feelings Javaman Apr 2023 #16
THIS 👍 How people fantasize about stage actors and singers, they get chubbies for the drag stars. TheBlackAdder Apr 2023 #35
:) Why assume they are not? This is OF COURSE going to the courts. Hortensis Apr 2023 #17
They are. A Republican Judge in Tennessee just blocked a ban on drag shows Marius25 Apr 2023 #20
Well, here's a little progress...... KY_EnviroGuy Apr 2023 #21
Thank you. Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #23
Are. Nothing is absolute Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2023 #24
Books are protected under the same amendment. pwb Apr 2023 #26
They should be. Maybe the courts will get it right, but don't hold your breath. sinkingfeeling Apr 2023 #27
Just hasn't been litigated this way yet. intheflow Apr 2023 #29
Did Somebody RobinA Apr 2023 #30
You're being reasonable, but the magats are treating drag like it's porn Bucky Apr 2023 #31
Kind of ironic considering that the movie "Mrs. Doubtfire" was generally considered LuckyCharms Apr 2023 #33
Yes, yes they can, and do. Ferrets are Cool Apr 2023 #36
Impersonating a female claudette Apr 2023 #45
The TN and KY bans absolutely are that draconian Withywindle Apr 2023 #51
i just LOVE your last line orleans Apr 2023 #57
It is protected by the first amendment LostOne4Ever Apr 2023 #34
Notice that Republicans do not go after internet porn that any kid can watch endlessly for free. Midnight Writer Apr 2023 #40
They are. Ms. Toad Apr 2023 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Please help me understand...»Reply #49