Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ancianita

(43,325 posts)

28. Agree.

Reply to Hope22 (Reply #26)

Sat Apr 8, 2023, 10:20 AM

Apr 2023

I'm all over the place on strategy. Our silence is partly what got them to this point.

Now rethugs are fighting in court to make it clear that pro-choice Americans are going to have to eat their sexist elephant one bite at a time.

Hoping the Garland response is also calculated to stop all this agency control through courts down the road.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Statement of Attorney General Garland on abortion medication rulings [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2023 OP

That Texas "judge" should be joshdawg Apr 2023 #1

This judge is a hypocrite. no_hypocrisy Apr 2023 #2

Off topic maxrandb Apr 2023 #3

in all fairness NJCher Apr 2023 #4

and I might add NJCher Apr 2023 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #29

Sometimes you have to shame people COL Mustard Apr 2023 #16

Here's an idea StoolPigeon Apr 2023 #8

Good idea Farmer-Rick Apr 2023 #20

Weak. Garland should have echoed what Senator Wyden said Tarc Apr 2023 #6

That federal judge will be partying with Clarence on some yacht this summer yaesu Apr 2023 #9

We know this strengthens his position COL Mustard Apr 2023 #19

Careful! The DU Garland Protection Squad will be after you! (nt) Paladin Apr 2023 #10

Or, as I like to call us, wnylib Apr 2023 #14

What a brilliant perspective. wnylib Apr 2023 #11

I'd like to see him ignored, too NJCher Apr 2023 #13

That certainly feels good, but it's also a dangerous road to go down. paleotn Apr 2023 #17

Thanks for the clarity. ancianita Apr 2023 #27

precisely. and thank you. stopdiggin Apr 2023 #30

I don't know, the death of healthcare and control for women in the United States Hope22 Apr 2023 #26

Agree. ancianita Apr 2023 #28

Eat their sexist elephant...nicely put. Hope22 Apr 2023 #32

lol it's an old saying I came across ancianita Apr 2023 #34

Oh claudette Apr 2023 #7

A judge can't just ban an FDA-approved medication! What's next, banning insulin?! yardwork Apr 2023 #12

Goddamn lawless judge belongs in a revival tent not in any public office dalton99a Apr 2023 #15

Alliance for Hypocritical Medicine peppertree Apr 2023 #18

Weak tea! onecaliberal Apr 2023 #21

They could do this with any medication or vaccine. That is why this needs to be reversed as JohnSJ Apr 2023 #22

This is how fascists destroy democracy Mysterian Apr 2023 #23

An equal problem is these drugs have important uses other than just pregnancy termination. paleotn Apr 2023 #24

Yes, elections have consequences....vigilance is need to counter these clowns. Historic NY Apr 2023 #25

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #31

We need a female judge to ban viagra, cialiis and the other boner drugs. lindysalsagal Apr 2023 #33

A sternly worded letter, that will teach them. nt Hotler Apr 2023 #35