Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)

31. I don't understand why we care about that...there will still be a primary regardless...the

Reply to live love laugh (Reply #3)

Thu Apr 13, 2023, 10:08 AM

Apr 2023

judiciary is more important. We will win the seat regardless.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Feinstein offers to give up Judiciary Committee seat temporarily [View all] Nevilledog Apr 2023 OP

That is good news Bev54 Apr 2023 #1

That should appease most of us. BigmanPigman Apr 2023 #2

Highly doubtful. Just A Box Of Rain Apr 2023 #8

Not me. Time to retire. housecat Apr 2023 #11

She is retiring at the end of this term, we have 3 excellent Tumbulu Apr 2023 #23

We are not getting judges and if we can put someone on the committee with her still in Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #32

The word "selfish" comes to mind. housecat Apr 2023 #39

If the actual issue is getting judges confirmed soldierant Apr 2023 #17

It is not the only issue, we are down a Senator. Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #27

It depends if we need the 9 GOP to vote on it a temporary replacement is used...if it blocks Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #30

I'm just wondering if a temp is possible. Has it been done before? live love laugh Apr 2023 #3

I don't understand why we care about that...there will still be a primary regardless...the Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #31

Didn't she propose a temporary replacement on live love laugh Apr 2023 #33

She did indeed soldierant Apr 2023 #44

"done before" seems to have lost its meaning housecat Apr 2023 #40

Good for her dweller Apr 2023 #4

I accept. dchill Apr 2023 #5

She should have done this weeks ago. 50 Shades Of Blue Apr 2023 #6

+++. nt Tetrachloride Apr 2023 #15

Is that within Senate rules? Raven123 Apr 2023 #7

its up to each party leader to appoint its members on committees. drray23 Apr 2023 #10

Do you have a link to support that? Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #12

If that is the case then she needs to resign. Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #28

Perhaps they have agreed that leaders will appoint members Raven123 Apr 2023 #35

Why so different from the House? housecat Apr 2023 #41

Because it's the senate Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #42

can't argue there. Thanks housecat Apr 2023 #43

The rules say otherwise Fiendish Thingy Apr 2023 #38

Had a call for donations from California Dems Wishful-Thinking Apr 2023 #9

+1. nt Tetrachloride Apr 2023 #24

+100 Duppers Apr 2023 #25

We love ya Senator Feinstein BOSSHOG Apr 2023 #13

Thank you, Senator Auggie Apr 2023 #14

There you go. Simple solution. Midnight Writer Apr 2023 #16

When is she announcing her run for reelection? Renew Deal Apr 2023 #18

she has already announced the opposite dsc Apr 2023 #21

If we want Texas judges more, be like Feinstein Tetrachloride Apr 2023 #19

Thank you, Ms Finestein Catherine Vincent Apr 2023 #20

Thank you, Senator UTUSN Apr 2023 #22

The GOP, or more accurately 9 GOP senators, would have to approve this dsc Apr 2023 #26

Then she needs to resign ASAP. We could lose the Senate in 24...it is very tough for us...and Demsrule86 Apr 2023 #29

It's disappointing that she waited this long & clearly only because of the outcry themaguffin Apr 2023 #34

Ro Khanna straight up telling her to resign. I'm sick OF IT nt GuppyGal Apr 2023 #36

Sorry fans. How about a cost/benefit analysis for her staying another minute. housecat Apr 2023 #37