Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(142,195 posts)
77. Here you go...
Thu Apr 13, 2023, 07:39 PM
Apr 2023

Abe Fortas

Ethics scandal and resignation[edit]

Fortas remained an associate justice, but in 1969, a new scandal arose. Fortas had accepted a US$20,000 (equivalent to $148,000 in 2021[40]) retainer from the family foundation of Wall Street financier Louis Wolfson, a friend and former client, in January 1966. In return for unspecified advice, it was to pay Fortas $20,000 a year for the rest of Fortas's life (and then pay his widow for the rest of her life).[41] However, in order to avoid apparent impropriety, Fortas returned the money the same year and received no further payments.[42] Fortas was not unique in receiving this type of funding and other Justices had similar arrangements. William O. Douglas, Fortas's mentor, likewise received funding from casino magnate Albert Parvin through his own foundation.[43] The American Bar Association revamped its rules as a result of the Wolfson affair, revising circumstances under which judges should not accept outside income.[3]

Wolfson was under investigation for securities violations at the time, and it was alleged that he expected that his arrangement with Fortas would help him stave off criminal charges or help him secure a presidential pardon. He asked Fortas to help him secure a pardon from Johnson, which Fortas claimed that he did not do. Fortas recused himself from Wolfson's case when it came before the Court.[3]

In May 1969, Life magazine chronicled Fortas's tangled relations with Wolfson. The revelation engendered calls for Fortas to be impeached, and motivated Richard Nixon, who knew that Fortas's resignation would enable the appointment of a more conservative Justice, ordered the Justice Department to investigate Fortas. Nixon was unsure if an investigation or prosecution was legal, but was convinced by then-Assistant Attorney General and future Chief Justice William Rehnquist that it would be.[24][44] Chief Justice Earl Warren (who, like the other Justices, was unaware of Nixon's actions) urged Fortas to resign to protect the reputation of the Court and avoid impeachment proceedings, as did Justice Hugo Black. However, when Fortas said it would "kill" his wife, Black changed his mind, realized that Nixon wanted Fortas off the Court for political reasons, and urged Fortas not to resign.[41][24][44] Nonetheless, Fortas ultimately decided resignation would be best for him and for his wife's legal career after Attorney General John N. Mitchell threatened to prosecute him, and potentially investigate his wife for tax evasion.[24][44] On the subject of his resignation, William J. Brennan later said, "We were just stunned." Fortas later said he "resigned to save Douglas," another justice who was being investigated for a similar scandal at the same time.[3] Fortas resigned from the Court on May 14, 1969.[1] When the Justice Department heard the news, the Attorney General's office celebrated, and Nixon called to congratulate them.[24][44]

In 1970, Louis Wolfson surreptitiously taped a private telephone call with Fortas. The transcript of this call was disclosed by Wolfson's lawyer, Bernard Fensterwald, to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward in 1977. The Washington Post subsequently published several excerpts from the transcript, including language suggesting that Fortas might indeed have spoken with President Johnson about a pardon for Wolfson, but there is no evidence that it was a quid pro quo rather than a voluntary intervention for a friend. Wolfson was convicted of violating federal securities laws later that year and spent time in prison.[45]

Fortas's seat on the Supreme Court was vacant until June 1970, when Harry Blackmun was sworn into office.[1] This was Nixon's third attempt to fill the vacancy. His earlier failed nominations were of Clement Haynsworth in September 1969 and G. Harrold Carswell in February 1970.[20]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abe_Fortas

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Corrupt MF................... Lovie777 Apr 2023 #1
Clarence has GOT to go! lastlib Apr 2023 #50
Just-us for sale. Operators are standing by. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 2023 #2
Please please please I hope this takes uncle clarence down kimbutgar Apr 2023 #3
Uncle Clearance: "We're having a 2 for 1 BLOWOUT on the shadow docket this week!" NullTuples Apr 2023 #74
Lawbreaker Thomas Casady1 Apr 2023 #4
dun dun dun... orleans Apr 2023 #5
It bugs me that this corruption has been going on for years and is just now being exposed. Midnight Writer Apr 2023 #6
I know what you mean PatSeg Apr 2023 #15
Like who paid off Judge Boof's MontanaMama Apr 2023 #31
Yep! This. ⬆️ BadgerMom Apr 2023 #67
Yes. Midnight Writer Apr 2023 #70
Wow!! Clarence sure is Harlan"s pet Demovictory9 Apr 2023 #7
But who enforces said law, and what is the penalty for violation? NullTuples Apr 2023 #8
It appears if you rise high enough, PatSeg Apr 2023 #16
I'm no expert but that seems a fatal flaw for any civilization that allows it? NullTuples Apr 2023 #23
Definitely a fatal flaw PatSeg Apr 2023 #85
He'd have to be impeached Diraven Apr 2023 #62
It is actually a felony, Scruffy1 Apr 2023 #86
Tsk tsk maxsolomon Apr 2023 #9
Exactly, and the amount of ego-stroking in Crow's glib excuses is off the charts. crickets Apr 2023 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #10
hmmmm... I wonder if this is finally over the "can't ignore" line. n/t TygrBright Apr 2023 #11
Nah, Pubs don't have a line for that Gregory Peccary Apr 2023 #45
That makes it worse yet. LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #12
Disgusting that Thomas would have Crow fix up his mother's home. Hortensis Apr 2023 #13
Yea one more thing with which he'll get away Fullduplexxx Apr 2023 #14
Lock that motherfucking traitorous, corrupt Uncle Ruckus up! His POS seditionist wife as well. Celerity Apr 2023 #17
Please Jesus! Yes!! LymphocyteLover Apr 2023 #18
Bye bye uncle Thomas malaise Apr 2023 #19
How is the end nigh? He's not going to face any consequences Marius25 Apr 2023 #28
And the Slobfather was never going to be indicted or arrested malaise Apr 2023 #34
Do you know what it takes to punish a Supreme Court justice? Marius25 Apr 2023 #35
Indict his wife for her crimes. lees1975 Apr 2023 #47
Lol, good luck getting Merrick Garland to go after a Justice's wife Marius25 Apr 2023 #49
I realize that everything we are aware she has done soldierant Apr 2023 #71
this is fucking insanity-- he needs to be impeached LymphocyteLover Apr 2023 #20
Impeachment is not even on the table because Republicans will not agree. Lonestarblue Apr 2023 #38
yeah, I know it's a nonstarter. Still... even calls for resignation are nlikely to be strong enough LymphocyteLover Apr 2023 #60
If he only understood Stare Decis and keeping Ginni away Captain Zero Apr 2023 #21
I'M SHOCKED! 2naSalit Apr 2023 #22
Appears? why can't Thomas llashram Apr 2023 #24
That arrogant piece of shit and his insane wife are too exposed to last housecat Apr 2023 #29
I truly hope so llashram Apr 2023 #32
It requires control of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate to expel a Justice Marius25 Apr 2023 #30
Rules and laws are different for the Deplorable Repugs - there are NONE. NoMoreRepugs Apr 2023 #25
This has to be one of the most corrupting judiciary stories ever. bucolic_frolic Apr 2023 #26
Let me guess. There's a "rule" against indicting a sitting Supreme Court Justice. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2023 #27
Pretty sure there's no such rule. ShazzieB Apr 2023 #87
I'm talking indictment. As enforcement of federal criminal law. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2023 #90
Much as he deserves inictment... ShazzieB Apr 2023 #92
No way this wasn't a "Quid Pro Quo" arrangement. Paladin Apr 2023 #33
Crow got a house and three lots Zeitghost Apr 2023 #88
Was there any money exchanged under the table for that deal? LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #36
Need to keep putting pressure on Thomas. LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #37
Laws, shmaws Mysterian Apr 2023 #39
What the ever-lovin F is going on with this guy and this court Bristlecone Apr 2023 #40
a house and 2 lots for 133,363? Kali Apr 2023 #41
I bet that's just the "recorded" amount peppertree Apr 2023 #44
It was almost twenty years ago. In many areas, prices were a lot cheaper then Tom Rinaldo Apr 2023 #51
wasn't even 10 years ago Kali Apr 2023 #55
Thanks for correcting the date. I obviously skimmed it wrong. Tom Rinaldo Apr 2023 #57
it does sound like somebody was trying to get around something with multiple names on deeds Kali Apr 2023 #58
Thomas ain't brilliant, but he isn't an idiot either Tom Rinaldo Apr 2023 #69
He'll claim that no one "advised" him to report it. kskiska Apr 2023 #42
K&R UTUSN Apr 2023 #43
Resign Joinfortmill Apr 2023 #46
Yes. Resign. Unfortunately he won't. calimary Apr 2023 #61
About the only thing that will have much effect on him is to keep the pressure up. lees1975 Apr 2023 #48
One law for the common man, another for the king Hekate Apr 2023 #52
With all that's coming out, he's going to have a hell of an IRS tab to pay Warpy Apr 2023 #53
None of these stories Zeitghost Apr 2023 #75
Unreported income Warpy Apr 2023 #76
None of these recent stories involve unreported income to the IRS Zeitghost Apr 2023 #78
Vacations, gifts, income from a property sale? Warpy Apr 2023 #83
No, they don't Zeitghost Apr 2023 #84
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2023 #93
Thomas and his cult wife will pay no consequences Catherine Vincent Apr 2023 #54
Geez, why doesn't anything like this ever happen to me? NBachers Apr 2023 #56
yeah, how do we get a billionaire friend to buy stuff from us, over market value BlueWaveNeverEnd Apr 2023 #63
Was it over market value? Zeitghost Apr 2023 #79
Harlan bought another home and lot (same street) for $40K, paid 133k for Thomas 1 home, 2 lots BlueWaveNeverEnd Apr 2023 #81
Interesting Zeitghost Apr 2023 #82
Wow, I had no idea multi-billion dollar Crow Holdings did single residential remodels! tanyev Apr 2023 #59
Didn't Justice Abe Fortas resign for less? Vogon_Glory Apr 2023 #64
Excellent reminder. nt crickets Apr 2023 #66
Here you go... spanone Apr 2023 #77
What seems to be the problem here ? I'm a supreme court justice. republianmushroom Apr 2023 #68
Recommended. H2O Man Apr 2023 #72
Clarence and Ginni were REALLY hoping to keep this quiet FakeNoose Apr 2023 #73
Long Dong Silver did a bad, baaaaaaad thing Blue Owl Apr 2023 #80
please lord let this take Thomas DOWN proud patriot Apr 2023 #89
Who else on the court is not disclosing it? BeckyDem Apr 2023 #91
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Billionaire Harlan Crow B...»Reply #77