Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(42,770 posts)

20. Understood. But I'm talking trump finally agreeing to

Thu May 4, 2023, 03:26 PM

May 2023

turn over being fishy to me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Still stuck on rape case DNA... Anyone else? [View all] Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 OP

+++++ emulatorloo May 2023 #4

It's been tested. There was a rumor that there was no male DNA Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #5

So who would she have conspired with to get a spunk sample from TFG? TheBlackAdder May 2023 #16

That's right, civil trial is plaintiff v. defense or respondent. Liberal In Texas May 2023 #23

They might have sabotaged the evidence MutantAndProud May 2023 #2

Yes, followed that case! Sabotage a court case and evidence? Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo May 2023 #3

In a normal world, would agree 100%. But in a world Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #8

99.99999% sure of that. Silent Type May 2023 #9

Let's go with 100% ... WTHN Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #26

Stalling tactic Mordred May 2023 #10

Thank you. Now it makes sense. Nt spooky3 May 2023 #12

Dressmust not have had any dna of quality then. Cuz Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #13

Not necessarily. yardwork May 2023 #18

Understood. But I'm talking trump finally agreeing to Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #20

Just because his counsel said that doesn't mean they really would yardwork May 2023 #22

Good point. If you focus on delay, putting too many balls up in the Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #25

But... How did they know they wouldn't agree? ( To accept Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #29

True !!! So we can agree on a given .. he did it! Because like you said, an Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #30

No but he had the DNA report. But hadn't been matched Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #14

Wasn't the DNA shanti May 2023 #15

*supposedly her legal team said there were 4 peoples Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #19

Read a bit more. Carroll got the people she knew of Laura PourMeADrink May 2023 #21

Not fooled one bit. Kingofalldems May 2023 #24