Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy Carcetti

(44,508 posts)
14. I think people might be misinterpreting this.
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:05 AM
Jun 2023

Court filings for the arraignment include her name. People assume she's been assigned to hear the arraignment.

The arraignment is in Miami.

Judge Cannon sits in Fort Pierce, which is over 100 miles north of Miami.

It would make no sense for one judge to travel 100 miles down to a place where there are multiple judges available to hear the case.

However, Judge Cannon did notoriously oversee the review of the documents that formed the basis for these charges.

Therefore, it's possible--and likely even, considering the logic of the situation--that her name was included simply because of her prior involvement on the case, not because she's been assigned to hear it.

Electronic court filings typically have a broad service list that includes all lawyers and individuals who have been involved in the case at some point.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I brought this up yesterday and everyone here chewed me out Marius25 Jun 2023 #1
I was not among them EYESORE 9001 Jun 2023 #3
What a terrible choice. She has already shown that she in for trump. brer cat Jun 2023 #2
It's not a choice VMA131Marine Jun 2023 #4
Actually, it's more likely getagrip_already Jun 2023 #8
Surely JanLip Jun 2023 #6
This is what I was afraid of... hippywife Jun 2023 #5
She needs to recuse herself....but won't since she's GOP. sinkingfeeling Jun 2023 #7
Wonderful atreides1 Jun 2023 #9
Can she just dismiss the case? Mz Pip Jun 2023 #10
Yes she can. Marius25 Jun 2023 #12
But it would be overturned on appeal... AGAIN. NT Happy Hoosier Jun 2023 #20
Before or after she dismisses the charges? Marius25 Jun 2023 #21
Doesn't matter. Happy Hoosier Jun 2023 #22
The main problem that she presents, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #11
Well, he can't complain about being treated unfairly tulipsandroses Jun 2023 #13
I think people might be misinterpreting this. Tommy Carcetti Jun 2023 #14
The crimes were committed in West Palm Beach Marius25 Jun 2023 #15
She should be randomly assigned, correct? gab13by13 Jun 2023 #17
It was actually Judge Reinhart who signed off on the warrant. Tommy Carcetti Jun 2023 #19
That's great news Effete Snob Jun 2023 #16
That will be fine with her, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #18
I don't think this is decided yet Johnny2X2X Jun 2023 #23
Unbelievable honest.abe Jun 2023 #24
Take a deep breath and read this. Bleacher Creature Jun 2023 #25
Thank you. This helps. honest.abe Jun 2023 #27
Uh... recusal???? Takket Jun 2023 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Grrrrr: Judge Aileen Cann...»Reply #14