Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

allegorical oracle

(6,518 posts)
41. Just finished. Most incriminating section, imo, is where boxes are moved behind the back of
Sat Jun 10, 2023, 12:26 PM
Jun 2023

Attorney 1, so he believes, presumably, that he's reviewed all the boxes for classified items that must be turned over to the FBI and NARA. But he didn't, again, presumably. That resulted in Atty 3, at atty 1's request, falsely certifying that the documents had been properly identified and surrendered.

That's unmitigated proof that djt willfully broke the law(s).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I read about half of it...it's pretty damning, pictures and all PortTack Jun 2023 #1
Started. Not finished AKwannabe Jun 2023 #2
I read it, or at least skimmed it, Silver Gaia Jun 2023 #3
Same here Blue Owl Jun 2023 #6
Yup. Same! Silver Gaia Jun 2023 #7
For those who'd rather listen intrepidity Jun 2023 #4
On the agenda for tomorrow; just found a link to download. n/t Backseat Driver Jun 2023 #5
I read it. MLAA Jun 2023 #8
I read it. Took about an hour. GoodRaisin Jun 2023 #9
i want to say he's a maniacal fuck orleans Jun 2023 #10
I think they need to go back to Bedminster and make one GoodRaisin Jun 2023 #12
Read it minutes after it was released TheSocialDem Jun 2023 #11
What are you thinking? A box might look like that if someone wanted to see Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #32
I don't think it's spilled ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author live love laugh Jun 2023 #13
Down loaded the PDF earlier in the day Inkey Jun 2023 #14
I read/skimmed it LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Stardust Jun 2023 #16
Via the New York Times Frasier Balzov Jun 2023 #17
I read it and it made me sick to my stomach. Not kidding. My stomach was in knots. chowder66 Jun 2023 #18
I downloaded from the Politico link as soon as it was posted here, in other words, ASAP Hekate Jun 2023 #19
Something "petty" I noticed... Grown2Hate Jun 2023 #20
pet peeve of mine Skittles Jun 2023 #22
Exactly. Grown2Hate Jun 2023 #24
Trump skipped a memorial ceremony because he was afraid his hair would get wet Skittles Jun 2023 #26
Must run in the family. TFG on Twitter wished everyone a "Happy Good Friday". no_hypocrisy Jun 2023 #27
Same here mercuryblues Jun 2023 #39
Over the weekend 👍 especially since Mr Smith asked us to electric_blue68 Jun 2023 #21
Read it last night DrivingOnThe Left Jun 2023 #23
fascinating grantcart Jun 2023 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Jun 2023 #28
I read it. phylny Jun 2023 #29
I read it. It's a quick, easy read. Not legalese. It's jaw-dropping. Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #30
I'm Printing It Off Right Now WiVoter Jun 2023 #31
Here's a link DUer IndyKatie gifted us to the annoted NYT copy. You owe it to yourself Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #33
I did. MineralMan Jun 2023 #34
I read the indictment and DIDN'T glue myself to the TV. brooklynite Jun 2023 #35
I read it last night. Fairly quick read for being 49 pages. Talitha Jun 2023 #36
I listened while Hal Sparks read it yesterday. GoCubsGo Jun 2023 #37
It's a pretty quick read RussBLib Jun 2023 #38
Getting there, lees1975 Jun 2023 #40
Just finished. Most incriminating section, imo, is where boxes are moved behind the back of allegorical oracle Jun 2023 #41
The individual documents read like a wedding registry for spies. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #42
I didn't read it yet. I was reading The Catcher in the Rye, so maybe I will read it when I'm done liberal_mama Jun 2023 #43
Read all of it. Scottie Mom Jun 2023 #44
I read it. yardwork Jun 2023 #46
I read it carefully. kentuck Jun 2023 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»okay -- who read the indi...»Reply #41