Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gab13by13

(32,433 posts)

8. I was told here that Cannon was just appointed temporarily,

Reply to onenote (Reply #4)

Sun Jun 11, 2023, 09:01 PM

Jun 2023

so I did some searching and found out that in Florida the Chief clerk has the authority to assign judges to cases. If that is what happened why hasn't someone said that?

I have been told that Cannon was chosen by a random draw and I will never believe that happened until I see the evidence.

Back to the title of my thread, why is there so much ambiguity?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Is There So Much Ambiguity With Judge Cannon? [View all] gab13by13 Jun 2023 OP

I think because we just don't know? intrepidity Jun 2023 #1

✔️ live love laugh Jun 2023 #2

Most here are not aware of Federal Criminal Procedure. Sneederbunk Jun 2023 #27

I've read on Daily Kos that it's permanent democratsruletheday Jun 2023 #3

See what I mean, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #7

How will he deal with it? onenote Jun 2023 #21

Because there a dozen voices, some claiming to be expert, who think they know how the process works onenote Jun 2023 #4

I was told here that Cannon was just appointed temporarily, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #8

Why are so many people spinning themselves up over ambiguities today when they know RockRaven Jun 2023 #5

I will bookmark your post and get back with you on Tuesday. gab13by13 Jun 2023 #9

What made her selection to preside over the search warrant improper? onenote Jun 2023 #10

OMG hurry and turn on msnbc gab13by13 Jun 2023 #12

Well, the 11th Circuit disagreed, so Tribe's opinion is worth jackshit. onenote Jun 2023 #13

Tribe cited the law/rule that governs recusal, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #16

"almost reprimanded"? onenote Jun 2023 #19

We can only wait until it happens. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #6

Media coin of the realm...... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #11

"It doesn't matter how certain they are. They will put out conflicting opinions." brooklynite Jun 2023 #20

Arraignment are usually boring stuff..... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #28

Looks like the goalposts have once again been moved I see. Kingofalldems Jun 2023 #14

OMG Tribe is really bashing Cannon, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #15

Yes, it was a travesty that she committed a gross legal error in the search warrant case onenote Jun 2023 #25

Answer, because the Court doesn't respond to the blogosphere. brooklynite Jun 2023 #17

It's the weekend. Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #18

What does Joyce Vance know? gab13by13 Jun 2023 #22

I don't blame OP one bit EndlessWire Jun 2023 #23

Why so much ambiguity? Because the local assignment procedures are extremely flexible. onenote Jun 2023 #24

The chief clerk said Cannon's assignment is permanent: dalton99a Jun 2023 #26