General Discussion

Ocelot II

(130,450 posts)

4. Interesting, and it does seem to explain why we haven't heard more about Bedminster.

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Wed Jun 14, 2023, 10:55 AM

Jun 2023

3-dimensional chess by Jack Smith?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Weissmann & Goodman: Jack Smith's Backup Option [View all] Nevilledog Jun 2023 OP

Maybe those charges edhopper Jun 2023 #1

There may be a NJ Grand Jury we don't know about AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2023 #3

A lot could be, and probably is, happening that we don't know about. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #5

Wouldn't we have heard about a search of Bedminster though? Marius25 Jun 2023 #7

Maybe? We didn't hear about the Miami GJ until they issued indictments AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2023 #8

Thought I read they didn't have enough probable cause Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #18

It has to be fresh evidence, not more than a year old...nt Trueblue Texan Jun 2023 #30

Not if the search came under a FISA warrant ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #44

Smith is leaning on Nauta, whose pleading is delayed 2 weeks to find FL lawyer Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #2

Ivana was pushed IMO. Too many coincidences to be a coincidence. OMGWTF Jun 2023 #15

This is as crazy as QAnon conspiracies ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #45

Interesting, and it does seem to explain why we haven't heard more about Bedminster. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #4

Not chess Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #11

Indictment done! Superseding indictment attaching sale of national of secrets will be a breeze. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #12

Charge what you can prove. sarcasmo Jun 2023 #6

THIS 👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽 a 1,000x THIS live love laugh Jun 2023 #17

Get that. But thought it was already in indictment Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #20

Or it could be that he's going with the case he's got wrapped up ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #46

I sure wish folks would look at the overall strategy relayerbob Jun 2023 #9

Thanks! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #21

They are not the only ones who think that these are not the end. Bev54 Jun 2023 #10

Good point! If he showed to two he showed to 200 Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #22

Yes because as pres he could de-classify like he did the top secret info the Russians in Bev54 Jun 2023 #23

Not just declassification though InstantGratification Jun 2023 #28

That, I believe is Molly Michael and I have said before she is the one that Jack Smith should Bev54 Jun 2023 #29

I thought the recording was by Meadows biographer, Margo something? intrepidity Jun 2023 #32

My understanding that the entire interview was recorded by Molly Michael as she did with all Bev54 Jun 2023 #34

Classification status has no relevance to the 31 Espionage Act charges. Nevilledog Jun 2023 #37

You're exactly right InstantGratification Jun 2023 #38

Thank you.. excellent information. If the aide Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #40

I'd guess that yesterday was the tip of the Jack Smith iceberg. rubbersole Jun 2023 #13

Some of the analysts on MSNBC yesterday mentioned that "venue" thing again BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #14

Smith has been way out ahead of everyone, and would never ignore Bedminster crime evidence. ancianita Jun 2023 #16

The graphic is perfect.. TY Cha Jun 2023 #25

Did you hear his presser after indictment? Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #41

Yes I did and loved it.. I got Cha Jun 2023 #42

Amen! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #43

That is SO perfect! Spazito Jun 2023 #33

Very impressed with the Special Counsel and the Garland DOJ! summer_in_TX Jun 2023 #19

+1 ancianita Jun 2023 #26

KnR Hekate Jun 2023 #24

"intentionally communicate ... intentionally disclose" bucolic_frolic Jun 2023 #27

I am not an attorney. I'm just an Veteran and a U.S. Citizen. So I am concerned. usaf-vet Jun 2023 #31

I feel you about the knife to a gunfight, though we've proven otherwise of late. ancianita Jun 2023 #35

MAN!! I do want to believe you are right. But a lot of us believe TFG couldn't win in 2016. He did. usaf-vet Jun 2023 #47

I don't want to be right. I just want rule of law to win. So far, it has. Hasn't it? ancianita Jun 2023 #49

I agree so far, the rule of law has won. But all we have done, IMO, is excise the defined tumor.... usaf-vet Jun 2023 #52

You don't think Garland's DOJ has treated this cancer across 50 states enough to ancianita Jun 2023 #53

Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2023 #36

There is speculation that Danascot Jun 2023 #39

IF, IF, IF. If I win the Megajackpot I could be a billionaire. A hell of a gamble. usaf-vet Jun 2023 #48

Actually it's very likely that the FISA Court would approve such a move from the DOJ, given ancianita Jun 2023 #50

IIRC Smith still has a grand jury seated in DC looking into multiple avenues of criminality pecosbob Jun 2023 #51