General Discussion

rubbersole

(11,209 posts)

13. I'd guess that yesterday was the tip of the Jack Smith iceberg.

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Wed Jun 14, 2023, 12:35 PM

Jun 2023

The orange Russian asset is going to go through some things.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Weissmann & Goodman: Jack Smith's Backup Option [View all] Nevilledog Jun 2023 OP

Maybe those charges edhopper Jun 2023 #1

There may be a NJ Grand Jury we don't know about AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2023 #3

A lot could be, and probably is, happening that we don't know about. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #5

Wouldn't we have heard about a search of Bedminster though? Marius25 Jun 2023 #7

Maybe? We didn't hear about the Miami GJ until they issued indictments AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2023 #8

Thought I read they didn't have enough probable cause Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #18

It has to be fresh evidence, not more than a year old...nt Trueblue Texan Jun 2023 #30

Not if the search came under a FISA warrant ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #44

Smith is leaning on Nauta, whose pleading is delayed 2 weeks to find FL lawyer Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #2

Ivana was pushed IMO. Too many coincidences to be a coincidence. OMGWTF Jun 2023 #15

This is as crazy as QAnon conspiracies ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #45

Interesting, and it does seem to explain why we haven't heard more about Bedminster. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #4

Not chess Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #11

Indictment done! Superseding indictment attaching sale of national of secrets will be a breeze. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #12

Charge what you can prove. sarcasmo Jun 2023 #6

THIS 👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽 a 1,000x THIS live love laugh Jun 2023 #17

Get that. But thought it was already in indictment Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #20

Or it could be that he's going with the case he's got wrapped up ExWhoDoesntCare Jun 2023 #46

I sure wish folks would look at the overall strategy relayerbob Jun 2023 #9

Thanks! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #21

They are not the only ones who think that these are not the end. Bev54 Jun 2023 #10

Good point! If he showed to two he showed to 200 Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #22

Yes because as pres he could de-classify like he did the top secret info the Russians in Bev54 Jun 2023 #23

Not just declassification though InstantGratification Jun 2023 #28

That, I believe is Molly Michael and I have said before she is the one that Jack Smith should Bev54 Jun 2023 #29

I thought the recording was by Meadows biographer, Margo something? intrepidity Jun 2023 #32

My understanding that the entire interview was recorded by Molly Michael as she did with all Bev54 Jun 2023 #34

Classification status has no relevance to the 31 Espionage Act charges. Nevilledog Jun 2023 #37

You're exactly right InstantGratification Jun 2023 #38

Thank you.. excellent information. If the aide Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #40

I'd guess that yesterday was the tip of the Jack Smith iceberg. rubbersole Jun 2023 #13

Some of the analysts on MSNBC yesterday mentioned that "venue" thing again BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #14

Smith has been way out ahead of everyone, and would never ignore Bedminster crime evidence. ancianita Jun 2023 #16

The graphic is perfect.. TY Cha Jun 2023 #25

Did you hear his presser after indictment? Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #41

Yes I did and loved it.. I got Cha Jun 2023 #42

Amen! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #43

That is SO perfect! Spazito Jun 2023 #33

Very impressed with the Special Counsel and the Garland DOJ! summer_in_TX Jun 2023 #19

+1 ancianita Jun 2023 #26

KnR Hekate Jun 2023 #24

"intentionally communicate ... intentionally disclose" bucolic_frolic Jun 2023 #27

I am not an attorney. I'm just an Veteran and a U.S. Citizen. So I am concerned. usaf-vet Jun 2023 #31

I feel you about the knife to a gunfight, though we've proven otherwise of late. ancianita Jun 2023 #35

MAN!! I do want to believe you are right. But a lot of us believe TFG couldn't win in 2016. He did. usaf-vet Jun 2023 #47

I don't want to be right. I just want rule of law to win. So far, it has. Hasn't it? ancianita Jun 2023 #49

I agree so far, the rule of law has won. But all we have done, IMO, is excise the defined tumor.... usaf-vet Jun 2023 #52

You don't think Garland's DOJ has treated this cancer across 50 states enough to ancianita Jun 2023 #53

Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2023 #36

There is speculation that Danascot Jun 2023 #39

IF, IF, IF. If I win the Megajackpot I could be a billionaire. A hell of a gamble. usaf-vet Jun 2023 #48

Actually it's very likely that the FISA Court would approve such a move from the DOJ, given ancianita Jun 2023 #50

IIRC Smith still has a grand jury seated in DC looking into multiple avenues of criminality pecosbob Jun 2023 #51