Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

H2O Man

(79,059 posts)
25. I was saying it
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 07:51 PM
Jun 2023

more inresponse to the defendent's cult members and ass-kissing republicans that blurt it out like sheep. I always refer them to prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi's comments on how in the court of public opinion, there is no "innocent until proven guilty." I saw a film clip of a cowardly punk who executed his three little boys the other day ...... even though he confessed to police once in custody, within the court system, he is still "innocent" until the judge accepts his guilty plea. But we know that he is guilty as sin.

To borrow a phrase from John Lennon, I might be "a legend in my own lunch-time"!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The relevant legal standard for being president onenote Jun 2023 #1
not during an election... Pototan Jun 2023 #2
Yes voters can use any standard they want onenote Jun 2023 #3
Hence, my argument Pototan Jun 2023 #5
As long as a candidate is a 35-year-old natural born citizen, who's lived here 14 years,... LudwigPastorius Jun 2023 #4
I never try to convert the cultists... Pototan Jun 2023 #6
If someone needs to be convinced you've probably already lost them onenote Jun 2023 #7
I guess there's no need to campaign, then. Pototan Jun 2023 #10
Campaigning is as much about turnout as it is convincing voters onenote Jun 2023 #20
2022 was not about turnout... Pototan Jun 2023 #21
Cultist or not, them's the actual standards. Igel Jun 2023 #8
What standard do you apply? Pototan Jun 2023 #9
There is a difference between "Qualified" and "Eligible" Pototan Jun 2023 #17
Agree that the workplace standard is a good argument Alice Kramden Jun 2023 #11
Thanks Pototan Jun 2023 #16
I can see using this Alice Kramden Jun 2023 #19
The problem is Timewas Jun 2023 #12
Again, I'm talking about an argument that can be made... Pototan Jun 2023 #13
The GOP floods the zone with BS.... carpetbagger Jun 2023 #14
That's why my argument... Pototan Jun 2023 #15
Great OP malaise Jun 2023 #18
It is in H2O Man Jun 2023 #22
Technically, you are correct... Pototan Jun 2023 #24
I was saying it H2O Man Jun 2023 #25
As someone who is not going to be on the jury in any of Donald's many criminal cases Raftergirl Jun 2023 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can I please explain "inn...»Reply #25