Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Carol Leonnig's WaPo article about DOJ delays in investigating Trump [View all]Bev54
(13,450 posts)45. Oh there are gaps in the story for sure. One of the most blatant errors was to say
that subpoenas for the fake electors went out the day of the J6 committee meeting June 21, when in fact those subpoenas were issued on May 25th. The DOJ already had some of the phones of those involved in the fake electors scheme, including Rudy's phone (Sept 2021) and was disseminating it which would suggest they likely got information from it.
The investigation into Sidney Powell was also started in Sept 2021
There is a good article at Empty Wheel, scrutinizing this WaPo article.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/06/19/the-wapo-shows-there-should-be-more-scrutiny-of-steve-dantuono/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
curious choice indeed, especially as some of them attack past associations to discredit things they
Celerity
Jun 2023
#56
Oh there are gaps in the story for sure. One of the most blatant errors was to say
Bev54
Jun 2023
#45
All that is needed is for good men to do nothing. It sounds like we had a lot of good men
Autumn
Jun 2023
#9
I'm angry too. We might lose it all thanks to feckless white men looking the other way
onecaliberal
Jun 2023
#14
Nonsense. President Biden made it clear he would NOT interfere with how the DOJ ran or its
JohnSJ
Jun 2023
#27
Jesus. Just finished reading the whole thing. Thank you for it, spooky3. But good God.
Scrivener7
Jun 2023
#23
I know. The three biggest investigations, while the rest of them are running around
Scrivener7
Jun 2023
#34
Good point, but I am wishing that President Obama had made a different choice.
colorado_ufo
Jun 2023
#42
What a misguided statement. Garland would have been light years better than any trump appointee,
JohnSJ
Jun 2023
#43
Garland said since this investigation started he would follow the evidence wherever it
doc03
Jun 2023
#47
And don't forget the fake electors. They didn't do anything about that either.
Scrivener7
Jun 2023
#62