Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(9,045 posts)
5. That might be one reason
Wed Jul 5, 2023, 11:44 PM
Jul 2023

why he is labeled Witness #5 rather than Individual #2. At least for part of this and thus far as not having been arraigned. But in direct answer to the question I don't honestly know. It seems from what we know that he knew what sort of crooked dealings Individual #1 was all about. So I think it feels like willing participation at this point. I don't know and I would hope that Smith can get what he needs from other ways to get convictions of them both.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Witness 5 removed approx...»Reply #5