Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The consequences of ONE election. [View all]emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)97. It is a discussion board so people will discuss.
Additionally all DUer are looking to the future. You see that in all the other threads here. DUers are good at walking and chewing gum at the same time.
P.S. 2016 was a very important election and all these years later we are still dealing with the consequences of Trumps election. Theres no point in pretending it didnt happen, or minimizing it, or rewriting history.
The consequences are still current so we are going to discuss it, as well as what we are going to do in the future to come out the other side.
BTW, DU has a great feature called trash thread if you dont want to read any more.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I blame our so-called allies who sabotaged her campaign, or who were no-shows, or slow-shows.
Oopsie Daisy
Jul 2023
#1
Since you indicated support for the comment, what are "slow-shows"? It seems that those would be...
xocetaceans
Jul 2023
#88
I love the book, cite it often, full of useful data. Wish they'd done a study about 2020 too.
betsuni
Jul 2023
#118
Sanders supporters like myself who are liberals, not just "change" voters,
FoxNewsSucks
Jul 2023
#46
That's fantastic! You're fortunate to have been there (despite the nastiness and unpleasantness.)👍
Oopsie Daisy
Jul 2023
#61
Of course they did. I wonder if anyone inside their respective campaigns knew.
Oopsie Daisy
Jul 2023
#131
They knew in April and May: "But why didn't you go to your supporters? Why didn't you take
betsuni
Jul 2023
#132
I'd like to know, too. That the Democratic Party takes for granted, doesn't listen to, ignores
betsuni
Jul 2023
#87
What was the problem with the party platform, the most progressive in history, as was the 2020
betsuni
Jul 2023
#117
Sanders voters voted for Clinton than Clinton voters voted for Obama.
Cuthbert Allgood
Jul 2023
#139
Hillary held her first campaign event a few weeks after the convention, Sanders not until September
betsuni
Jul 2023
#93
Obama: "At the end of our contest, I saw the grace and the energy with which she threw herself
betsuni
Jul 2023
#114
'And no it hasn't always been that way either. Are you aware why the EC even exists?"
inthewind21
Jul 2023
#153
Yes, and African American voters don't sit out elections when they don't get everything they need.
yardwork
Jul 2023
#29
Yes... that. But I'd also include Ford pardoning Nixon. That's when the toxic GOP started.
Oopsie Daisy
Jul 2023
#39
It was more than one election. It was several cycles that got us where we are...nt
Wounded Bear
Jul 2023
#41
This would be Hillary's 2nd term. Things would have been much different. Much better.
Oopsie Daisy
Jul 2023
#77
The sad part is that we all have been repeatedly warned of the consequences back in 2015.
Beastly Boy
Jul 2023
#44
The consequences of unethical anti-democratic maneuvers by Mitch McConnell and his
Martin68
Jul 2023
#58
We've been fighting in a post- 2016 national emergency ever since. 2016 continues, year 7.
Hortensis
Jul 2023
#73
Then they would have to accept that it is the candidate who loses elections, not the voter.
Autumn
Jul 2023
#157
Apparently people need to be reminded of the TRUTH. So many lies right here in this thread.
Oopsie Daisy
Jul 2023
#124