Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,645 posts)
24. It's from a large study & other data that show a massive DE-population in most of the world by 2100.
Wed Jul 12, 2023, 11:14 PM
Jul 2023
Researchers Say Earth Is Headed for "Jaw-Dropping" Population Decline

"It's extraordinary, we'll have to reorganize societies."

https://futurism.com/global-birth-rates-falling-precipitiously

People around the globe are having way fewer babies. By the year 2100, that might turn into a pretty big problem for humanity — rather than the relief one might expect. If they aren’t already, dozens of countries’ populations will be going into decline in this century, according to a new study published in the Lancet this week. 23 countries are expected to feel this effect intensify, with their populations dropping to half of what they are now by the year 2100.

The global population will peak at 9.7 billion around 2064, according to the new projection, and then drop off to 8.8 billion towards the end of the century. “That’s a pretty big thing; most of the world is transitioning into natural population decline,” Christopher Murray, co-author and researcher at the University of Washington, Seattle, told the BBC. “I think it’s incredibly hard to think this through and recognize how big a thing this is; it’s extraordinary, we’ll have to reorganize societies.”

The reality is that with more women receiving an education and entering the work force, combined with the wide availability of contraception, fertility rates are dropping, sometimes precipitously, around the world — a stark reversal of the baby boom following the Second World War. Countries including Spain, Portugal, and Thailand will have their populations more than halve by the end of the century — “jaw-dropping,” according to Murray.

But aren’t fewer humans better for a ravished world that’s rapidly being drained of its resources? The researchers suggest that there may be fewer babies being born, but any positive consequences for the environment would be offset by the challenges of a rapidly aging population. Much older populations “will create enormous social change,” Murray told the BBC. “Who pays tax in a massively aged world? Who pays for healthcare for the elderly? Who looks after the elderly? Will people still be able to retire from work?” “We need a soft landing,” he added.

snip



Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study

https://tinyurl.com/ybadb2q7

snip

Findings

The global TFR in the reference scenario was forecasted to be 1·66 (95% UI 1·33–2·08) in 2100. In the reference scenario, the global population was projected to peak in 2064 at 9·73 billion (8·84–10·9) people and decline to 8·79 billion (6·83–11·8) in 2100.

The reference projections for the five largest countries in 2100 were

India (1·09 billion [0·72–1·71],

Nigeria (791 million [594–1056]),

China (732 million [456–1499]),

the USA (336 million [248–456]),

and Pakistan (248 million [151–427]).



By 2050, 151 countries were forecasted to have a TFR lower than the replacement level

183 were forecasted to have a TFR lower than replacement by 2100.

23 countries in the reference scenario, including Japan, Thailand, and Spain, were forecasted to have population declines greater than 50% from 2017 to 2100

China's population was forecasted to decline by 48·0% (−6·1 to 68·4) by 2100.

China was forecasted to become the largest economy by 2035 but in the reference scenario, the USA was forecasted to once again become the largest economy in 2098.


CURRENT:

Africa is by far the main dystopian area in terms of far too high birth-rates:

2.1 is replacement level.


https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/total-fertility-rate

1 Niger 6.9
2 DR Congo 5.9
3 Mali 5.9
4 Chad 5.7
5 Angola 5.5
6 Nigeria 5.4
7 Burundi 5.4
8 Burkina Faso 5.2
9 Gambia 5.2
10 Uganda 5
11 Tanzania 4.9
12 Mozambique 4.9
13 Benin 4.8
14 Guinea 4.7
15 South Sudan 4.7
16 Central African Republic 4.7
17 Cameroon 4.6
18 Ivory Coast 4.6
19 Zambia 4.6
20 Senegal 4.6
21 Mauritania 4.6

22 Afghanistan 4.5 Highest Non African

23 Guinea Bissau 4.5
24 Equatorial Guinea 4.5
25 Sudan 4.4
26 Republic of the Congo 4.4
28 Togo 4.3
29 Sierra Leone 4.3
30 Liberia 4.3
31 Sao Tome And Principe 4.3
32 Ethiopia 4.2
33 Malawi 4.2
34 Comoros 4.2
35 Madagascar 4.1
36 Eritrea 4.1
37 Rwanda 4
38 Gabon 4
41 Ghana 3.9
46 Zimbabwe 3.6
52 Kenya 3.5
53 Namibia 3.4
54 Egypt 3.3
57 Lesotho 3.1
59 Algeria 3
60 Eswatini 3
65 Botswana 2.9
73 Djibouti 2.7
79 South Africa 2.4
80 Morocco 2.4
96 Tunisia 2.2
97 Libya 2.2

The highest European nation is France, 2nd highest is Sweden. We here in Sweden have had large programmes to raise it up in the past, but both here and in France, it is non European descent Swedes and French who are raising it higher, with the amounts of non European immigrants in Sweden being a fairly new thing, only really happening in the last 20-25 years or so to any truly large degree, other than Persians and Chileans, who came here due to the US empiric CIA coup d'etats in 1953 and 1973, respectively, plus small amounts from other various post WWII US empiric wars and coups before the big ones (and I mean non European conflicts, not talking about the Balkans in the 1990's, which really impacted Sweden too) hit in the 2000s onward.

2.1 is replacement level

117 France 1.9
126 Sweden 1.8

132 China 1.7
133 United States 1.7
134 Brazil 1.7
135 United Kingdom 1.7

The lowest birth-rate nations:

178 Italy 1.3
179 Spain 1.3
180 Ukraine 1.3
181 Moldova 1.3
182 Bosnia And Herzegovina 1.3
183 Cyprus 1.3
184 Andorra 1.3
185 Macau 1.2
186 Malta 1.2
187 Hong Kong 1.1
188 Singapore 1.1
189 South Korea 1

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This isn't particularly good for environmental issues. jimfields33 Jul 2023 #1
Look at you - tippy-tapping your electrons all over the place EYESORE 9001 Jul 2023 #3
😁 PCIntern Jul 2023 #7
lol dino salads really GenXer47 Jul 2023 #8
Oil actually formed from marine life. honest.abe Jul 2023 #28
It can't be good for the population either. Initech Jul 2023 #26
They sent a lot of emails bucolic_frolic Jul 2023 #2
More Nigerian princes willing to transfer their vast sums of money to the bank accounts of Americans dalton99a Jul 2023 #4
... tavernier Jul 2023 #5
Interesting but the landmass is too small for that to work ecstatic Jul 2023 #6
India is much much smaller than USA and has 1.4 billion BlueWaveNeverEnd Jul 2023 #9
You are right. former9thward Jul 2023 #21
Oh, 400 million is just the start. Multiple projections show at least double that by 2100, some Celerity Jul 2023 #15
Not with this coming. roamer65 Jul 2023 #17
I think we'll be back to the stone ages by then.. ecstatic Jul 2023 #20
These population projections never pan out Showbizkid Jul 2023 #23
It's from a large study & other data that show a massive DE-population in most of the world by 2100. Celerity Jul 2023 #24
That kinda proves my point Showbizkid Jul 2023 #25
We shall see. Climate change was factored in, but perhaps not enough. Celerity Jul 2023 #27
That's one side of a two-sided coin Showbizkid Jul 2023 #29
Assuming the borders of Nigeria stay the same DFW Jul 2023 #10
The Chinese megafarms in Siberia will handle this Showbizkid Jul 2023 #11
Food for oil, eh? DFW Jul 2023 #13
wow can you imagine all the nigerian princes who will need our help to get cash out of the country?? dembotoz Jul 2023 #12
I heard of one guy who actually got the better of them DFW Jul 2023 #14
Nigeria is going to be nearly uninhabitable by 2050. roamer65 Jul 2023 #16
too hot? BlueWaveNeverEnd Jul 2023 #18
Yeah. roamer65 Jul 2023 #19
& regressive/wingnut Texas has surplus of $32.7BILLION and takes BIDEN cash UTUSN Jul 2023 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A country slightly bigger...»Reply #24