General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MTG is showing, on the House Floor, nude photos of Hunter Biden having sex [View all]Quanto Magnus
(1,393 posts)I think it's shitty, I don't know about the legality of all of this.
They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace.... etc.
Does the invasion of privacy and sharing of images obtained through a third party merit some legal recourse?
Otherwise, it seems like they could just go out and publish any nude/sex act on the floor (or in committee) on any of their fellow congress people, or any random person they don't like. So people should go out and spy on/film others (or steal someone's personal data), give the vid to a congress critter and you're golden?
This seems above and beyond debate. As many have mentioned here, it appears more like revenge porn (even though Hunter and Marge haven't done nasty together).
What are they debating here and what relevance does Hunter Biden having sex on camera have in this debate?
You say that D.C. laws cannot apply here. Would there be a federal status she is violating?
Just repeatedly posting the Article doesn't really help giving any context other than there's a certain level of immunity. Committing a felony is not protected. Is revenge porn or invasion of privacy (which this seems to include) only a misdemeanor federally?