General Discussion

ShazzieB

(23,052 posts)

53. Rights, schmights.

Mon Aug 7, 2023, 07:21 PM

Aug 2023

We all know 45 thinks he should have the "right" to say anything he wants to anyone, about anyone or anything, in any manner, time, or place of his choosing, including, but not limited to, social media, campaign rallies, and TV interviews.

We all also know what 45 is full of, and it ain't just hamberders!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

JUST IN: Trump has filed his response to the special counsel's motion for a protective order. [View all] kpete Aug 2023 OP

I refuse to join xwitter. Can someone summarize? lindysalsagal Aug 2023 #1

here: kpete Aug 2023 #3

Oh, dam. I'm not attempting that. lindysalsagal Aug 2023 #7

You're not going to....read the filing? brooklynite Aug 2023 #19

No, you're supposed to read it for them and provide an executive summary. /s emulatorloo Aug 2023 #37

"Once upon a time...." brooklynite Aug 2023 #47

I tried! Alliepoo Aug 2023 #55

That is where the document is publicly filed for all to read. Bev54 Aug 2023 #22

I have to get in front of a monitor. Conjuay Aug 2023 #31

Here's an article about it. emulatorloo Aug 2023 #38

You're not attempting...words? Tarc Aug 2023 #59

When I click on the document it goes to Document Cloud and not Twitter. chowder66 Aug 2023 #4

You don't have to join X Jilly_in_VA Aug 2023 #5

Forget X - Hit the second link for the entire 29 page document Brother Buzz Aug 2023 #13

Sharpie or Crayon? Kennah Aug 2023 #2

Ketchup dweller Aug 2023 #29

Thank You RB77 Aug 2023 #36

Ba-Dum-TISHhh! electric_blue68 Aug 2023 #63

Who is this "President" Trump referred to in the response? YDogg Aug 2023 #6

I hope the answer to this reads Jilly_in_VA Aug 2023 #8

Trump was never obliged to show up for this pre-trial hearing. brooklynite Aug 2023 #20

Yep dalton99a Aug 2023 #9

All these motions and responses, all emails, have nothing to do with jailing anyone. Alexander Of Assyria Aug 2023 #12

No the protective order is standard but Trump lawyers are trying to get a hearing Bev54 Aug 2023 #24

Wasn't the point of that particular post ExWhoDoesntCare Aug 2023 #60

For those of us who have trouble processing/understanding stuff.... usedtobedemgurl Aug 2023 #10

Main issue is defining sensitive materials and how to deal with them. Alexander Of Assyria Aug 2023 #14

Thank you. usedtobedemgurl Aug 2023 #15

This response is a joke. triron Aug 2023 #11

1st amendment BS and claims false allegations and didn't figure worth reading on at that point! Brainfodder Aug 2023 #16

LOL, they're being ballsy. Jirel Aug 2023 #17

As a non-laywer can the judge say "screw you" (in legalize) to drumphf & co? electric_blue68 Aug 2023 #18

Happens all the time ExWhoDoesntCare Aug 2023 #61

Ok, good! Ty. electric_blue68 Aug 2023 #62

Thanks but, Disaffected Aug 2023 #21

Federal rules of criminal procedure. n/t Ms. Toad Aug 2023 #26

Disaffected make joke, Disaffected Aug 2023 #43

OK. Ms. Toad Aug 2023 #46

Won't argue (or joke) Disaffected Aug 2023 #48

It's actually pretty funny, now that I know what Fed R. Crim means! ShazzieB Aug 2023 #49

Ah, I guess my foray into comedy Disaffected Aug 2023 #50

It's Fed. R. Crim. P. . . . markpkessinger Aug 2023 #30

Isn't he a reporter on Ted Lasso? Generic Brad Aug 2023 #51

Djt's allies and defenders keep referring to him as "President". Only Biden is now President. Jrose Aug 2023 #23

Favorable views? Brainfodder Aug 2023 #27

If that's what they're trying to do, it's really obnoxious and offensive. ShazzieB Aug 2023 #52

"In a trial about First Amendment rights..." choie Aug 2023 #25

Well that's their horse Conjuay Aug 2023 #28

That was Lauro's go to comment in his CNN interview. honest.abe Aug 2023 #33

so Trump's asshole lawyer is schooling the judge? agingdem Aug 2023 #34

They mistake the judge for Judge Cannon I guess. emulatorloo Aug 2023 #39

So when does the judge start lecturing Trump and his attorneys? Irish_Dem Aug 2023 #40

waiting..waiting agingdem Aug 2023 #42

Dark Brandon really got in their heads...... getagrip_already Aug 2023 #32

That was the dumbest part of their filing. Couldn't beleive how stupid the 'argument' was emulatorloo Aug 2023 #35

They are made that Jack Smith included a copy of Trump's internet threats in his filing. Irish_Dem Aug 2023 #44

Eh, Jack Smith is going to rip this to shreds. First of all this is not a First Amendment issue and cayugafalls Aug 2023 #41

Is it tear stained? CanonRay Aug 2023 #45

Rights, schmights. ShazzieB Aug 2023 #53

"President" orangecrush Aug 2023 #54

Question for prospective jurors (and unfortunately, lawyers): usonian Aug 2023 #56

Djt wasn't a great fan of 1st Amendment rights when peaceful protesters were beaten... Jrose Aug 2023 #57

Trump's interpretation of the 1st Amendment Sessuch Aug 2023 #58